There always been debate about acceptance of bad live or trying to do something to make it better.

There always been debate about acceptance of bad live or trying to do something to make it better. In my opinion, people should act and achieve goals to make themselves happy rather than accept a bad situation. On the other hand, some people can not act to make life better, because of high risk and responsibility for family. In addition, job is only source of income to survive, in the case of losing a job they can lose everything, Moreover, some people are trying to increase income. Yet, they are unable to pay for knowledge, as education may be expensive. For instance, majority of people tend to stay in comfort zone and for action, they need reasonable motivation. Moreover, every hard decision as changing job have high risk and can make they life even worst. On the other hand, people should at least try to change situation for a better side. Moreover, in today s competitive world, people need improve hard and soft skills in order to get high compensation. In addition, it is better try rather than regret whole life. If people really want to improve situation they achieve it. As popular economic law, "higher risk requires higher compensation In my opinion, it is better to try to do something and make live better rather than wasting live. However, for some group of people like elder generation it is hard to change situation as they can afford risks Personally, I want to achieve my goals and striving for a better life. Because we live only once and do not have another chance, As such it can be concluded that some people unable to change situation because of risk and comfort zone. On the other hand trying to change live is good solution. I think that, people should at least try to change situation because we ive on y once