The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France from 1995 to 2005.
The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France from 1995 to 2005. dm296
The provided pie charts demonstrate statistical data regarding the proportion of various methods of energy procedure in France over a decade.
Overall, what stands out from the charts is that while the highest percentage of energy was taken from coal which was the most dominant method throughout the given period, the other types apart from the given indexes displayed the most insignificant role. Of a particular note is that whereas energy was produced much more than the first year in all ways, Petro illustrated a considerable decline, respectively.
Looking at the information in more details, it is evident that in both initial and last years, coal and gas were the most popular modes in energy production with almost the same percentages, merely over 30%. When It comes to Petro, it experienced a dramatic difference with 10% jumping from 29% in 1995 to 19. 55% in 2005.
Conversely, It is noteworthy that from 1995 to 2005 nuclear rose noticeably from 6. 40% to 10. 10%, followed by other types from 4. 90% to 9. 10%.
The provided pie charts demonstrate statistical data regarding the proportion of various methods of
energy
procedure in France over a decade.
Overall
, what stands out from the charts is that while the highest percentage of
energy
was taken
from coal which was the most dominant method throughout the
given
period, the other types apart from the
given
indexes displayed the most insignificant role. Of a particular note is that whereas
energy
was produced
much more than the
first
year in
all ways
, Petro illustrated a considerable decline,
respectively
.
Looking at the information in more
details
, it is evident that in both initial and last years, coal and gas were the most popular modes in
energy
production with almost the same percentages,
merely
over 30%. When It
comes
to Petro, it experienced a dramatic difference with 10% jumping from 29% in 1995 to 19. 55% in 2005.
Conversely
, It is noteworthy that from 1995 to 2005 nuclear rose
noticeably
from 6. 40% to 10. 10%, followed by other types from 4. 90% to 9. 10%.
Do not write below this line