The government should to promote alternative sources of energy. Do you agree or disagree.

In this modern world with growing population increases demand for energy. To solve this problem some people believe that government has to advance alternative springs such as: solar energy, nuclear energy and etc, whilst others against to this. I strongly agree with former disease controversial issue and this essay will discuss, why. First and key point to this is that natural sources are endless and unpoisonable. For instance, solar power is probably the cleanest free spring of energy we can get and the sun is a powerful fusion reactor, where hydrogen atoms fuse to form helium and give off a tremendous amount of energy. The energy produced by these solar farms be enough not only for hot water of local area, but also to supply the whole world with electricity. This occurs without nuclear power and almost no oil or coal which might allow reduction in carbon dioxide emissions from electricity production over the period. Consequently, if we promote energy sources, air will become fresher. The second reason for my view is that, promotions on energy basics lighten financial life of population. For example, it is evidence that the natural energy taken from renewable resources like wind or solar is three times cheaper than those which we extract by chemical methods. And since they are free, operational costs are nearly zero once a turbine is erected. Hence, if government advances energy sources, it will cost for its locals nearly free of charge. By way of my conclusion I want to restate my view that, in this world where people livie in industrialized or developed countries are relatively small percentage but they consume a huge share of the total energy produced in order to supplement the consumed energy, the state must create new energy resources