The best way to reduce poverty in developing countries is by giving up to 6 years of free education to children so that they can at least read, write and use numbers. To what extent do you agree or disagree with the statement?

Education plays important role reducing poverty. The developing countries, at times, struggle to help those who are uneducated. I believe that by offering free education to students year would bear positive fruits long term. Such programs may not serve the purpose completely, but it does offer people some basic literacy to further move on. Ergo, I completely agree with this statement. It is true to state that free education has an effect in the fight against poverty. Only the human talent can bring the prosperity to people and the nation. Hence it is of utmost priority to invest in the human talent by offering free education. In the European nations, for instance, children have the right to free and compulsory primary and secondary education. Many other developing nations have recognized this need, and moving into the right direction of making education accessible to all. There are a number of benefits associated with free education up to the primary level. First of all, it might help control the child labor for the underprivileged family. Some children have no fortune of going to school because they have no financial assistance from their parents. Secondly, the primary level of education would enable them to read, write and calculate numbers. This much of education will at least help them know their rights. Lastly, there is more likelihood of passing the culture of education down to the next generation. It means the educated parents would ensure that their children receive education for better opportunities and a quality life. In conclusion, I do believe that free education has the potential to change the life of people, and it is a key to success. It is also a universal truth that education has helped countless people think critically and research a lot many things.