Some people spend more time reading books, while others prefer to watch TV. The former group are more likely to develop creative imaginations and have a much better grasp of language skills. Do you agree or disagree?
Some people spend more time reading books, while others prefer to watch TV. The former group are more likely to develop creative imaginations and have a much better grasp of language skills. mj13K
In some respects, online newspaper are considerd to be a better method to acquire knowledges and capabilities, compared to books. However, many people argued that reading is the best way to develop creative imaginations and grasp language skills. I completely argee with this idea.
On the one hand, substantial benefits can be gained from the frequent reading of traditional publications. Initially, books allow readers to activate and nurture imagination. In other word, people immerse themselves in a different world potrayed in paperback with little or no illustrations. For instance, when audiences read, they need to visualize the story behind the words. By self-imagining, the way to decipher verbal cues and cultivate mental image can be sharpened. Additionally, this trend is also beneficial in terms of facilitating language acquisition. Because vocabulary, grammar and logic using in handbooks is more literacy and accurate than websites or online articles, readers are able to exposure to new words in context, which promotes both precision and diversity of language use.
On the other hand, the syndication of a plethora of online articles can have some disruptive influence. It appears that the preference of reading digital newspaper may inhibit creativity and imagination. Unlike hardbacks, the vivid nature of web-based publications slimplifies reading comprehension by not requiring the use of visualization. Beside, vocabulary as well as word count is often presented shortly to ensure conciseness and brevity. Furthermore, cyber magazines also negatively affect language use. This happens along with the fast-paced production of online news without selective choice of vocabulary and grammar. As a result, viewers may be under the impact of this passive method of absorbing information undermines intellectual development in the long run.
In conclusion, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I strongly believe that spending more time reading books bring about better linguistic abilities and creativity, compared to online articles.
In
some
respects,
online
newspaper are
considerd
to be a better method to acquire
knowledges
and capabilities, compared to books.
However
,
many
people
argued that
reading
is the best way to develop creative imaginations and grasp
language
skills
. I completely
argee
with this
idea
.
On the one hand, substantial benefits can
be gained
from the frequent
reading
of traditional publications.
Initially
, books
allow
readers to activate and nurture imagination. In other
word
,
people
immerse themselves in a
different
world
potrayed
in paperback with
little
or no illustrations.
For instance
, when audiences read, they need to visualize the story behind the words. By self-imagining, the way to decipher verbal cues and cultivate mental image can
be sharpened
.
Additionally
, this trend is
also
beneficial in terms of facilitating
language
acquisition.
Because
vocabulary, grammar and logic using in handbooks is more literacy and accurate than websites or
online
articles, readers are able to exposure to new words in context, which promotes both precision and diversity of
language
use
.
On the other hand
, the syndication of a plethora of
online
articles can have
some
disruptive influence. It appears that the preference of
reading
digital newspaper may inhibit creativity and imagination. Unlike hardbacks, the vivid nature of web-based publications
slimplifies
reading
comprehension by not requiring the
use
of visualization.
Beside
, vocabulary
as well
as
word
count is
often
presented shortly to ensure conciseness and brevity.
Furthermore
, cyber magazines
also
negatively
affect
language
use
. This happens along with the
fast
-paced production of
online
news without selective choice of vocabulary and grammar.
As a result
, viewers may be under the impact of this passive method of absorbing information undermines intellectual development in the long run.
In conclusion
, for the reasons I have mentioned above, I
strongly
believe that spending more time
reading
books bring about better linguistic abilities and creativity, compared to
online
articles.
Do not write below this line