some people say that government should spend money on faster public transport. others think that money should be spend on different aspects such as cost reduction and environment conservation. discuss both views and give your own opinion.

There has been an ongoing debate among the individuals, facilities of civil transportation must be improved by the authorities through some money, however opponent have conflicting viewpoints that, money should utilise on cost reduction and environmental problems. Admittedly, the predominant reason of the former perspective is that, these days, the traffic is incline at an alarming rate which put adverse impact on the surroundings. To elucidate, it is commonly observed that, majority of the masses prefer to travel by their own vehicles rather than public transport, because they think it takes more time if they travel by the trains or buses. Therefore, it is quite critical to pay attention to upgrade the public transportation. To epitome, Delhi which is famous city of India and the management of Delhi focus on business to make them fast and convenient for the population. That is the main reason, that city in the present time face less pollution. Paradoxically, there is concrete of latter opinion is that, environmental issues are major concern nowadays such as global warming and pollution and so on. To elaborate it, global warming is increasing, because million of people cut the trees for the wooden furniture and for firewood. According to a report which was printed on the Times of India and revealed that, every year nearly 75% trees are chup down due to fulfill the demand of human beings. As a result, if administration does not take any step towards climate change then the level of pollution might be at a dangerous stage. To conclude, it can be reiterated that, although public transport and environmental issues are equally matter to the population. Thus, authority should focus on both the problems to make individuals life more convenient.