some people believe that they must allocate fixed money to charity per month. what is your idea

It is frequently said that number of societies believe that people must allocate money in order to contribute to humanitarian works every month. I could not agree this issue and I will discuss this debate and give conclusion view. Firstly, supporting charity is a volunteer and not people have to give money to charity repeatedly. Example can be seen in this issue, pleasure and satisfying feeling should be transferred to who help others. In addition, how people prefer to do this depends on their afford and abilities and is not just financial aspect. For example, teaching children in deprived areas. On the one hand somebody tend to help others directly. Base on this approach they can understand how their money is spent such as paying cure of cancer patients. Notwithstanding, for supporting charity there is no compulsion in time and place. On the other hand, it seems to me that spending some our properties such as money, public service on needy people causes that our life be surrounded by spirituality and positive energy. Nevertheless, rate of poverty and people beg in our city and region decrease. Overall, in spite of all virtues and vices, it is obvious that contributing to charity activity must be volunteer and based on people’s financial situation and afford.