Some people believe that all wild animals should be protected. Others say that only a few wild animals should be protected. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

People have differing views about whether the preservation of most wild creatures is certainly essential, while others stand their ground that only a specific number of wild animals are worthy to be maintained. Although it can be argued that some animals should be abandoned, I am of the opinion that human beings have to give other creatures an aid to balance the eco- system. On one side of the argument, there are people who believe that human beings simply should preserve a number of animals. First main reason should be mentioned is the expenditure which people or government spend on preservation operations are numerous and waste. As non- profit activities, preservations do not bring people any significant incomes. Therefore, it will deplete the budget of nations day by day. Secondly, numerous number of wild animals can threaten remarkably to human- being lives. Due to the fact that abundant wild creatures themselves have abilities in natural instincts such as territory protection. Annual, a large number of people died because of hippos’ territory encroachments is a practical instance. I would be inclined to argue against this as I believe that animals should be treated and preserved equally. First of all, the existence of all creatures are totally necessary for the balance of the eco- system. Therefore, the assistants between each other are an inevitable development which creates harmony habitats. At the other hand of the scale, wild animals bring human beings various benefits such as fur for garments and horn for medicine ingredients. If people take advantage from these in wise ways, this will be the renewable sources for them, significantly. Nevertheless, I maintain my original position that the preservation of all wild animals is certainly worthy. Therefore, people should give an aid for creatures to create a sustainable environment development.