some people believ that there should be fixed punishments for each type of crime OTHER, however argue that the circumstance of an individual crime, and the mootivation for comitting it, should always be taken into account when deciding on the punisment. discuss both these views and give your own opinon.

few people percies that there should be fixed punishment for each type of crime while according to other, it shoulde be various punishment according their crime and also their might be few lenerse when go for punishment. these essay will discuess both views and my personel agrue is that it shoul be punishment to criminal accroding their crime. to commence with, there are several types of crimes some are gignetic and others are small. when someone catched by druing the rubberd then he should be punshiment by his crime rather than chearged by several crime. For istance, In the new york, police of new york catched the man during his rubbered and then they treated that man as killer. hence, such kind of law or punishment show the injustic. Moving towards final view, it is very significant to punishent to crimial according their crime but, "if it fixed the punishment for every crime, then might be crime will decline in future, For example, In afghanstan athourity of afghan has been punshing same to varoius crime, due this policy no one try to rubbe in addtion, after this ristrict rules rate of roube has been declined, as result, majorty of poeple will save from differnet rubber moreover, it will be peace full thing of every nations. consulsion, there are number of method are avilable to treate they criminal, but fixed punshment and diffenret punshiment both are valied in socity.