Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Some museums and art galleries charge admission fees, while others have free entry. Do you think the advantages of charging for admission outweigh the disadvantages? 2Pbd6
Preserving things has always been a hobby for many people including
many countries to show how their culture actually was. Many
countries have a number of museums of every kind. From stuffed
animals, dinosaur skeletons, old tools used by ancient people and
kings, and to the 18-century airplanes used in world wars. Many
museums and art galleries do charge entry fees for visiting while there
are also public museums and art galleries that do not charge at all.
This essay will enlight the view whether charging admission fees
have advantages or disadvantages and whether such advantages
outweigh the disadvantages.
To be honest, I personally believe that charging people for visiting
such a place is totally acceptable. As we all know that there are many
aspects of museums and art galleries where they have to keep all the
replaced as they are quite old and historical. Such museums only take
admission fees for maintaining the museum properly. Some items
such as Monalisa painting, old rare coins, and even the pre-historical
mammoth trunks are sold in millions and billions. Therefore, keeping
high security is also a part which can be arraigned by money taken
from critics.
assanged
On the other side, the only difference I see between those who charge
and those who does not is the popularity of the museum and the
artffacts which it contains. It's obvious that those museums and art
galleries that are normal do not usually charge. In addition, some are
also maintained by the government. I' the end, it's obvious that the
money which government uses for handling such places comes from the tax which their own country's citizen pays. Therefore, not
charging money for it does not really matter as people have already
paid it through tax.
To conclude, I totally agree with the statement that museums and art
galleries should obviously charge entry fees, but to a certain level so
all classes of people can afford it and admire the beauty of their
culture and historic things. As I previously mentioned security and
maintenance al ways take plaee first? 95 these factors do outweigh the the tax which their own country's citizen pays. Therefore, not
charging money for it does not really matter as people have already
paid it through tax.
To conclude, I totally agree with the statement that museums and art
galleries should obviously charge entry fees, but to a certain level so
all classes of people can afford it and admire the beauty of their
culture and historic things. As I previously mentioned security and
maintenance al ways take plaee first? 95 these factors do outweigh the
Preserving things has always been a hobby for
many
people
including
many
countries to
show
how their culture actually was.
Many
countries have a number of
museums
of every kind. From stuffed
animals, dinosaur skeletons,
old
tools
used
by ancient
people
and
kings, and to the 18-century airplanes
used
in world wars.
Many
museums and art galleries do
charge
entry
fees
for visiting while there
are
also
public
museums
and art galleries that do not
charge
at all.
This essay will
enlight
the view whether charging admission fees
have advantages or disadvantages and whether such advantages
outweigh the disadvantages.
To be honest, I
personally
believe that charging
people
for visiting
such a place is
totally
acceptable. As we all know that there are
many
aspects of
museums
and art galleries where they
have to
keep
all the
replaced as they are quite
old
and historical. Such
museums
only
take
admission
fees
for maintaining the
museum
properly
.
Some
items
such as
Monalisa
painting,
old
rare coins, and even the
pre-historical
mammoth trunks
are sold
in millions and billions.
Therefore
, keeping
high security is
also
a part which can
be arraigned
by money taken
from critics.
assanged
On the other side, the
only
difference I
see
between those who charge
and those who does not
is
the popularity of the
museum
and the
artffacts
which it contains. It's obvious that those
museums
and art
galleries that are normal do not
usually
charge
.
In addition
,
some
are
also
maintained by the
government
. I' the
end
, it's obvious that the
money which
government
uses
for handling such places
comes
from the tax which their
own
country's citizen pays.
Therefore
, not
charging money for it does not
really
matter as
people
have already
paid it through tax.
To conclude
, I
totally
agree
with the statement that
museums
and art
galleries should
obviously
charge
entry
fees
,
but
to a certain level
so
all classes of
people
can afford it and admire the beauty of their
culture and historic things. As I previously mentioned security and
maintenance
al ways
take
plaee
first
? 95 these factors do outweigh
the the
tax which their
own
country's citizen pays.
Therefore
, not
charging money for it does not
really
matter as
people
have already
paid it through tax.
To conclude
, I
totally
agree
with the statement that
museums
and art
galleries should
obviously
charge
entry
fees
,
but
to a certain level
so
all classes of
people
can afford it and admire the beauty of their
culture and historic things. As I previously mentioned security and
maintenance
al ways
take
plaee
first
? 95 these factors do outweigh the
Do not write below this line