Check your IELTS writing task 1 and essay, this is a free correction and evaluation service.
Check IELTS Writing it's free
British CouncilIDPCambridge
IELTS Writing Answer Sheet
Barcode 3
Candidate Name:
Jumayev Siroj
Center Number:
1
2
3
4
   
Candidate Number:
1
1
6
5
8
Module (shade one box):
Academic:
 
General Training:
Test Date:
2
D
0
D
   
0
M
1
M
   
2
Y
0
Y
2
Y
2
Y

Some countries today have passed against smoking tobacco in a public building such as offices and restaurants other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.

Some countries today have passed against smoking tobacco in a public building such as offices and restaurants other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour. YmjWN
Some countries have imposed laws against smoking cigarette on public areas while other countries just neglect that occasion in accordance with the people's own right and choices in this area. This essay will debate that situation and give a concluding view. Today it is getting a rise in multiplying public areas that allowed the access of smoking process by people who want and need it. In some extent it is morally righteous for people to use their own rights and legality in some areas, particularly even public places like offices and restaurants. This kind of people strongly argue that anti-smoking laws implemented by the government because they cannot go their daily pubs regularly in danger of complete ban. Supporters of this idea promote that people who smoke passively on public areas don't much affect on people's health are not allowed to go there naturalaly. Furthermore they think anti-smoking laws may possibly force many restaurants and bars out of their business which would decrease the considerable amount of clients of bars because particular number of these constant smokers. Although some countries consider smoking public areas right, many of the government are strongly opposed to that as it leads to health problems for the smoker, as well as for people close by. The etiquets on it which was written it is harmful to bodies may prove that people should not accustomed to this habit. Foremost, tobacco compiles of some injurious elements which cause serious harm to person's health. Anyone who are close to them may be given dangerous illnesses like lung cancers. In any case people's health must be more important than any business which mean that companies have to adapt to a ban by the government. To conclude, despite of some acceptances in some countries smoking on public areas should be banned massively because of its endless harm and injuries. Anti-smoking laws would improve the health of thousands of people and sustain the balance of health among the people.
Some
countries
have imposed
laws
against
smoking
cigarette on
public
areas
while other
countries
just
neglect that occasion in accordance with the
people
's
own
right and choices in this
area
. This essay will debate that situation and give a concluding view.
Today
it is getting a rise in multiplying
public
areas
that
allowed
the access of
smoking
process by
people
who want and need it. In
some
extent it is
morally
righteous for
people
to
use
their
own
rights and legality in
some
areas
,
particularly
even
public
places like offices and restaurants. This kind of
people
strongly
argue that anti-smoking
laws
implemented by the
government
because
they cannot go their daily pubs
regularly
in
danger
of complete ban. Supporters of this
idea
promote that
people
who smoke
passively
on
public
areas
don't much
affect
on
people
's
health
are not
allowed
to go there
naturalaly
.
Furthermore
they
think
anti-smoking
laws
may
possibly
force
many
restaurants and bars out of their business which would decrease the considerable amount of clients of bars
because
particular number of these constant smokers. Although
some
countries
consider
smoking
public
areas
right,
many
of the
government
are
strongly
opposed to that as it leads to
health
problems for the smoker,
as well
as for
people
close by. The
etiquets
on it which
was written
it is harmful to bodies may prove that
people
should not
accustomed
to this habit. Foremost, tobacco compiles of
some
injurious elements which cause serious harm to person's
health
. Anyone who are close to them may be
given
dangerous
illnesses like lung cancers. In any case
people
's
health
must
be more
important
than any business which mean that
companies
have to
adapt to a ban by the
government
.
To conclude
,
despite of
some
acceptances in
some
countries
smoking
on
public
areas
should
be banned
massively
because
of its endless harm and injuries. Anti-smoking
laws
would
improve
the
health
of thousands of
people
and sustain the balance of
health
among the
people
.
Do not write below this line
Official use only
CC
5.5
LR
5.0
GR
6.5
TA
5.0
OVERALL BAND SCORE
5.5
Barcode 1
Barcode 1

IELTS essay Some countries today have passed against smoking tobacco in a public building such as offices and restaurants other countries have no intention of doing this. Consider the possible arguments on both sides of this debate and reach your own conclusion on which side you favour.

👍 High Quality Evaluation

Correction made by newly developed AI

✅ Check your Writing

Paste/write text, get result

⭐ Writing Ideas

Free for everyone

⚡ Comprehensive report

Analysis of your text

⌛ Instant feedback

Get report in less than a second

Copy promo code:y2Lz4
Copy
Recent posts