Restoration of old buildings in main cities involves enormous government expenditure. It would be more beneficial to spend this money to build new houses and roads. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

Restoring old buildings in major cities costs the government a huge amount of money that could possibly be spent on other things, like new houses and roads. While I think it is important to develop a city, it is also important to look after historic buildings too. First old buildings give a city character. In other words, they tell the story of a city’s history and how it has changed over time. Cities like Prague, for instance, are massively popular tourist destinations because people can see magnificent buildings from centuries ago rather than be surrounded entirely by modern structures that are functional but have no soul. In addition, those ancient buildings carry many artistic values, which are inspired by their creators. As a result, they often have high artistic value and are an ideal tourist destination for tourists from all over the world. promote tourism economic development. Besides, new building and roads are equally essential as these structures and roads are the requirements of our new generation for their secure and safe future. Cabinet can use these funds which are raised by the selling of monument tickets, in addition to this new structure and roads are made with proper planning and maps hence these infrastructures are more safe and secure for the future generations however it will modify in the nation's property significance. In, conclusion both the heritage, new properties and roads are essential, whereas vintage properties will boost the revenue and new structure which are made for the betterment of future will give secure and safe shelter to new young generation hence authorities should focus on the renovation of old building and manufacturing of new infrastructure.