Recent studies have shown that as the costs of competitive sports increase, for example in terms of equipment, league fees, travel, and so on, so too do rates of obesity among children. Some people believe the government needs to subsidize sporting activities for children to help keep them fit. Others believe that it is up to parents to ensure their children are active and healthy. Compare the strengths of both views and state your own opinion.
Recent studies have shown that as the costs of competitive sports increase, for example in terms of equipment, league fees, travel, and so on, so too do rates of obesity among children. Some people believe the government needs to subsidize sporting activities for children to help keep them fit. Others believe that it is up to parents to ensure their children are active and healthy. Compare the strengths of both views and state your own opinion. dDK
Keeping children fit these days is very expensive. However, treating adults with complications due to obesity developed in childhood is even more costly. It is no wonder then that people want governments to somehow mitigate these expenses by making sports more affordable. On the other hand, it is understandable that some lay blame on parents for allowing their children to develop sedentary lifestyles. While both arguments have merit, I believe the best solution requires a combined effort by both authorities and parents.
To begin with, sports have become a conglomerate of associations and competitions that promotes winning and being well-equipped over having fun. Thus, kids need to buy hockey skates, tennis rackets, and special shoes, for example, and pay to join a program or team. In other words, sports and health are becoming luxuries that only high-earning families can afford. By giving families tax breaks on healthy spending, governments can, in the long run, actually save money in terms of healthcare costs as more children will maintain active habits as they get older. More importantly, this will make sports fun for kids and their parents and consequently make healthy lifestyle choices more attractive.
At the same time, parents need to encourage their children to go outside and play or to engage in a sport. They need to set time limits on computers and other devices and participate with their children in these fitness activities. After all, children learn from their parents, and if the parents ride bicycles with their children or play games with them, the children will consider these activities more natural. In contrast, parents who are lazy and use the television as a babysitter are doing their children a great disservice.
In the final analysis, governments can and should help kids be more active in terms of
affordability by rewarding active parents who look after their children’s health. Likewise,
governments can levy higher taxes on parents whose children develop health problems due to a lack of exercise. Ultimately, the only solution is a combination of government assistance and parental will.
Keeping
children
fit these days is
very
expensive.
However
, treating adults with complications due to obesity developed in childhood is even more costly. It is no wonder then that
people
want
governments
to somehow mitigate these expenses by making
sports
more affordable.
On the other hand
, it is understandable that
some
lay blame on
parents
for allowing their
children
to develop sedentary lifestyles. While both arguments have merit, I believe the best solution requires a combined effort by both authorities and parents.
To
begin
with,
sports
have become a conglomerate of associations and competitions that promotes winning and being well-equipped over having fun.
Thus
, kids need to
buy
hockey skates, tennis rackets, and special shoes,
for example
, and pay to
join
a program or team.
In other words
,
sports
and health are becoming luxuries that
only
high-earning families can afford. By giving families tax breaks on healthy spending,
governments
can, in the long run, actually save money in terms of healthcare costs as more
children
will maintain active habits as they
get
older. More
importantly
, this will
make
sports
fun for kids and their
parents
and
consequently
make
healthy lifestyle choices more attractive.
At the same time,
parents
need to encourage their
children
to go outside and play or to engage in a
sport
. They need to set time limits on computers and other devices and participate with their
children
in these fitness activities.
After all
,
children
learn from their
parents
, and if the
parents
ride bicycles with their
children
or play games with them, the
children
will consider these activities more natural.
In contrast
,
parents
who are lazy and
use
the television as a babysitter are doing their
children
a great disservice.
In the final analysis,
governments
can and should
help
kids be more active in terms of
affordability by rewarding active
parents
who look after their
children’s
health.
Likewise
,
governments
can levy higher taxes on
parents
whose
children
develop health problems due to a lack of exercise.
Ultimately
, the
only
solution is a combination of
government
assistance and parental will.
Do not write below this line