Recent studies have shown that as the costs of competitive sports increase, for example in terms of equipment, league fees, travel, and so on, so too do rates of obesity among children. Some people believe the government needs to subsidize sporting activities for children to help keep them fit. Others believe that it is up to parents to ensure their children are active and healthy. Compare the strengths of both views and state your own opinion.
Recent studies have shown that as the costs of competitive sports increase, for example in terms of equipment, league fees, travel, and so on, so too do rates of obesity among children. Some people believe the government needs to subsidize sporting activities for children to help keep them fit. Others believe that it is up to parents to ensure their children are active and healthy. Compare the strengths of both views and state your own opinion. dDK
Keeping children fit these days is very expensive. However, treating adults with complications due to obesity developed in childhood is even more costly. It is no wonder then that people want governments to somehow mitigate these expenses by making sports more affordable. On the other hand, it is understandable that some lay blame on parents for allowing their children to develop sedentary lifestyles. While both arguments have merit, I believe the best solution requires a combined effort by both authorities and parents.
To begin with, sports have become a conglomerate of associations and competitions that promotes winning and being well-equipped over having fun. Thus, kids need to buy hockey skates, tennis rackets, and special shoes, for example, and pay to join a program or team. In other words, sports and health are becoming luxuries that only high-earning families can afford. By giving families tax breaks on healthy spending, governments can, in the long run, actually save money in terms of healthcare costs as more children will maintain active habits as they get older. More importantly, this will make sports fun for kids and their parents and consequently make healthy lifestyle choices more attractive.
At the same time, parents need to encourage their children to go outside and play or to engage in a sport. They need to set time limits on computers and other devices and participate with their children in these fitness activities. After all, children learn from their parents, and if the parents ride bicycles with their children or play games with them, the children will consider these activities more natural. In contrast, parents who are lazy and use the television as a babysitter are doing their children a great disservice.
In the final analysis, governments can and should help kids be more active in terms of
affordability by rewarding active parents who look after their children’s health. Likewise,
governments can levy higher taxes on parents whose children develop health problems due to a lack of exercise. Ultimately, the only solution is a combination of government assistance and parental will. 
Keeping 
children
 fit these days is 
very
 expensive. 
However
, treating adults with complications due to obesity developed in childhood is even more costly. It is no wonder then that 
people
 want 
governments
 to somehow mitigate these expenses by making 
sports
 more affordable. 
On the other hand
, it is understandable that 
some
 lay blame on 
parents
 for allowing their 
children
 to develop sedentary lifestyles. While both arguments have merit, I believe the best solution requires a combined effort by both authorities and parents.
To 
begin
 with, 
sports
 have become a conglomerate of associations and competitions that promotes winning and being well-equipped over having fun. 
Thus
, kids need to 
buy
 hockey skates, tennis rackets, and special shoes, 
for example
, and pay to 
join
 a program or team. 
In other words
, 
sports
 and health are becoming luxuries that 
only
 high-earning families can afford. By giving families tax breaks on healthy spending, 
governments
 can, in the long run, actually save money in terms of healthcare costs as more 
children
 will maintain active habits as they 
get
 older. More 
importantly
, this will 
make
 sports
 fun for kids and their 
parents
 and 
consequently
 make
 healthy lifestyle choices more attractive.
At the same time, 
parents
 need to encourage their 
children
 to go outside and play or to engage in a 
sport
. They need to set time limits on computers and other devices and participate with their 
children
 in these fitness activities. 
After all
, 
children
 learn from their 
parents
, and if the 
parents
 ride bicycles with their 
children
 or play games with them, the 
children
 will consider these activities more natural. 
In contrast
, 
parents
 who are lazy and 
use
 the television as a babysitter are doing their 
children
 a great disservice.
In the final analysis, 
governments
 can and should 
help
 kids be more active in terms of
affordability by rewarding active 
parents
 who look after their 
children’s
 health. 
Likewise
,
governments
 can levy higher taxes on 
parents
 whose 
children
 develop health problems due to a lack of exercise. 
Ultimately
, the 
only
 solution is a combination of 
government
 assistance and parental will. 
Do not write below this line