Non state actors organisation

On the one hand, it can be widely argued that due to the uncertain circumstances during the past few years, tremendous questions have been raised such as to what extent the current leader of Myanmar can be approved on a global stage. More importantly, have the political and economic climate been affected by this unresolved tension? This essay will focus primarily on non-state actors, their contributions as well as identifying how so called, the Arakan Army (AA) and other insurgent groups namely, the Kachin Independence Organization (KIO), the Karen National Union (KNU) and the Ta'ang National Liberation Army (TNLA) systemised in response to the current military authoritarian of Myanmar. Drawing from this argument, the reason why these groups belong to insurgents is that since all of them were society and not state driven and heavily relying on locals, which is linked to Week17 material. Furthermore, unlike terrorist groups which focus on attacking civilians, the purpose of insurgents are rather security forces or put simply the government. Meanwhile, traced back to the 1990 general election when these groups came to mobilize, the victory of the National league of democracy party claimed to be the root of this conflict. This is because of both endogenous, exogenous forces and security problems among minorities in Myanmar. Amidst such conditions, this paved the way for military authoritarianism to dictate the country and caused anger as well as political boycott from the majority of the citizens at the same time.