More developing countries are given aid from international organisations to help them in their development plans. Some people argue that financial aid is important but others suggest that practicle aid and advice are more important. Discuss both views and give your opinion

World wide organisations are lending helping hands to emerging nations with their development plans. Arguments are being made about monetary or practical aid and advice, which is more beneficial. I firmly believe that both are equally important. In this essay, both points will be discussed. To begin with, one way used by internationally recognised organisations is by providing finances for development goals. Indeed to commence any project capital investment is given major emphasis. Scarcity of money can hinder an ongoing venture and lay it off. For instance, building roads in India take longer time than usual due to lack of funds. Even if the tender is passed successfully, sometimes inflation can make it economically non executable or out of budget. On the other hand, another way to succour underdeveloped nations with their growth plans is by giving practicle cooperation and suggestion by global associations. Nowadays, countries are facing problems like corruption, unemployment, poverty and pollution etcetera. It would be remarkably helpful if they could get some support and advice to cope with their predicament. It would gradually help boost their economy. In conclusion, it would be rational to draw that, international organisations should help undeveloped countries grow by equipping monetary support. It will fasten their growth rate. Moreover it is also significant to contribute some wise advice in order to overcome their problems.