Many vegetarians and vegans believe that they are not only improving their own health, but that they are also helping the world in general. What are the advantages and disadvantages of not eating meat? Do you agree that vegetarians and vegans are helping the world by their actions? 
Many vegetarians and vegans believe that they are not only improving their own health, but that they are also helping the world in general. What are the advantages and disadvantages of not eating meat? Do you agree that vegetarians and vegans are helping the world by their actions? 3gl
Lifestyle choices are varied, especially when it comes to eating. Those who refrain from
consuming animal products believe that not only are they making healthier choices, but they are benefiting the world at large. While there are likely benefits and detriments to a vegan diet, I doubt this choice has much impact on the rest of the world.
Firstly, those who do not eat fish and meat often abstain for moral or religious reasons. For some it is simply immoral to eat animals because they are living creatures. Others, such as practitioners of the Jain religion, believe that consuming or otherwise harming other living beings impedes the liberation of one’s soul. Thus a vegan can gain spiritual or moral comfort from this choice.
On a more practical level, however, the health benefits of veganism are debatable. There are those who consider red meat high in cholesterol and therefore unhealthy. Others counter that animal products contain essential proteins and other nutrients that fruit and vegetables simply cannot match. Thus, in terms of one’s well-being, this choice is again a matter of personal preference and an attention to one’s dietary needs.
Putting personal health aside, to suggest that veganism aids the world seems a bit of a stretch. Of course one can argue that eating less meat means less land, especially forested land, is wasted on grazing space to raise cattle. On the other hand, if humans did not kill animals, the latter might take over the land anyway. For instance, hunting is encouraged in some countries as a means of controlling animal populations, such as deer, that would otherwise grow and encroach on human habitations in search of food. In other words, killing animals serves the dual purpose of saving land for crops and feeding the world’s human population. Consequently, not eating meat products or fish would simply imply killing them as a form of pest control rather than a food supply.
In conclusion, veganism, though a commendable lifestyle choice, should remain a personal one based on a person’s health condition. As far as its impact on the world, it is likely minimal, and could even be detrimental if it becomes too popular
Lifestyle 
choices
 are varied
, 
especially
 when it 
comes
 to eating. Those who refrain from
consuming 
animal
 products believe that not 
only
 are they making healthier 
choices
, 
but
 they are benefiting the 
world
 at large. While there are likely benefits and detriments to a vegan diet, I doubt this 
choice
 has much impact on the rest of the world.
Firstly
, those who do not eat fish and 
meat
 often
 abstain for moral or religious reasons. For 
some
 it is 
simply
 immoral to eat 
animals
 because
 they are living creatures. Others, such as practitioners of the Jain religion, believe that consuming or 
otherwise
 harming 
other
 living beings impedes the liberation of one’s soul. 
Thus
 a vegan can gain spiritual or moral comfort from this choice.
On a more practical level, 
however
, the health benefits of veganism are debatable. There are those who consider red 
meat
 high in cholesterol and 
therefore
 unhealthy. Others counter that 
animal
 products contain essential proteins and 
other
 nutrients that fruit and vegetables 
simply
 cannot match. 
Thus
, in terms of one’s well-being, this 
choice
 is again a matter of personal preference and an attention to one’s dietary needs.
Putting personal health aside, to suggest that veganism aids the 
world
 seems a bit of a stretch. 
Of course
 one can argue that eating less 
meat
 means less 
land
, 
especially
 forested 
land
, 
is wasted
 on grazing space to raise cattle. On the 
other
 hand, if humans did not kill 
animals
, the latter might take over the 
land
 anyway. 
For instance
, hunting 
is encouraged
 in 
some
 countries as a means of controlling 
animal
 populations, such as deer, that would 
otherwise
 grow and encroach on human habitations in search of food. In 
other
 words, killing 
animals
 serves the dual purpose of saving 
land
 for crops and feeding the 
world’s
 human population. 
Consequently
, not eating 
meat
 products or fish would 
simply
 imply killing them as a form of pest control 
rather
 than a food supply.
In conclusion
, veganism, though a commendable lifestyle 
choice
, should remain a personal one based on a person’s health condition. As far as its impact on the 
world
, it is likely minimal, and could even be detrimental if it becomes too 
popular
Do not write below this line