Interviews are good then other methods.

In modern epoch, a majority of individuals believe that Internsiens are way it one of the most important and best to employ candidates for the grand companies. Whereas, other people say that interviews are not the reliable whom to employ instead of doing of choosing there are other better ways to employ tomeone. I completely disagree with this assertion and the partiment motion will be explicated further. To commence with, a vast majority of humans. days that interviews are the one of the most effective and honest method to employ someone for the large companies. Theya gays it recaust they believe that intervients is the to get an understand about candidate's behat only way behaviour, personality and their creativity moreover, interviews helps to the candidates to show their skills for the specific role they've applied for dinitially, interireus helps the employer to get to know the potential of candidates that how capable he or she is and how they can manage the problem when they got into tome binds trouble by asking questions and also by giving tome tricky tasks to check the humans sense and creativeness of that candidats Probing ahead, Interviews are for more better thanother choosing methods as there is no chance of bribe. In contrast, other methods are not to effective like such taking written test because there art & chance that test can be cheated and crombling of answers which cannot help companies to get perfect candidate as there is flawed methodology in other methods and wastage of time. In my point of view, I believe that there is no other type of method which can replace the interview method and not much effectives as interviews methods are because they helps to show the true capabilitie of candidates.