International marketing is sometimes seen as invasive and an intrusion into the country in question. Others argue that it is a necessary and economical form of education in addition to spreading ideas, language and culture. Discuss both views and then give your opinion.

Some people mention that the occurrence of global marketing will bring several benefits to each country. On the other hand, others believe that we should not support it. From my point of view, I think that there are a lot of advantages by participating of worldwide marketing due to cooperation of local individuals and foreigners. There have been many pros since establishing of international marketing. First of all, in the past, before having global marketing, people world have knowledge only about materials, or any kind of manufacturing in the specific areas because in that time, every country didn't contact each other as nowadays. For instance, in ancient Thai, people always ate marely traditional fund, such as soup, whereas, currently, this country is influented from various countries. As a result, we can find plenty at different national diet. Secondly, local individuals will recieve new languages because of arrival of foreign countries. For example, after some companies have been in Thailand for a period the number of workers who can speak English fluently has increased obviously. However, there are some drawbacks as well. As a lot of foreign companies have come to the local area, some original companies are closed because they lose the marketing competition to new companies. To sum up, there are both pros and cons of global marketing, but all in all, the advantages still outweigh. Therefore, we should encourage for having this thing. Finally, government should set the effective regulations to control the international companies to not get rid of the previous local firms.