In several countries, children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it a valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?

Nowadays, child laboural become a controvercial notion amnog many countries, a bunch of people opined that it is an offence to hired an immature worker, while others argued that it is the best stage where one child can learn certain kind of life lessons. However, I am on the fance, but the latter one has a plethora of advantages in certain age criteria. To commence with, I believe that teenage is a bigennig age stage, where one can start obtain life and work experience. For instance, one child had to started to get mini rolls and parts in earliy age if he wants to be a popular actor in forthcoming life. As a result, in a young age teenager could be able to earn on his own leg, moreover, name and fame would be started to by it self while time flies. Furthermore, not only children will not face any difficulties in future to earn name and fame, but also they can fullfill their requirment and being able to live luxrious life in adulthood. On the other hand, only over 15 years shold get involve in work life because underage young and nive is not preperd to suffer from laboural chellenges by either physically or mentally. For example, in India, a 10 year old waiter can be seen in several restaurents with under paid job. According to Indian law, it is grave crime to hire an uderage child. To conclude, as per the above arguements it cannot be underastimed that childlaboural is a serious offence in specific countries, which is also prove detrimental impacts on an immatured. However, It would be potentially benefited to teenagers for further life, though age criteria is restricted.