In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. Do the advantages of such a method outweigh the disadvantages?
In order to solve traffic problems, governments should tax private car owners heavily and use the money to improve public transportation. Do the advantages of such a method outweigh the disadvantages? QBPL9
Nowaday the population uses private cars. There are a lot of problems. Moreover traffic is the main problem of the government even though it has public transportation. This essay will examine both these statements of advantages and disadvantages of taxing private cars and use the money to improve public transportation.
On the one hand, the government should improve public transportation due to the fact that they want people to decrease the use of private cars. Additionally cars produce an effect on air pollution such as carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide which cause global warming. For instance, if the population adopts public transportation in lieu of private cars it can reduce carbon dioxide approximately 13% in air. That is the advantage of taxing private cars.
On the other hand, a method should tax private car owners heavily to affect business about cars and citizens. Firstly the citizens paid an amount to tax private cars. Second It will has effect to automotive industry because of population shall diminished buy cars. For example if government should taxing increased 10% by car therefore citizens have expenditure more than usually 10%. That is caused for determine choose buy car. That is the disadvantage of taxing private cars.
In conclusion, I strongly believe that the government should tax private cars which is a good idea. Due to the fact it had the advantage more than the disadvantage in improving public transportation and developing the environment. Nevertheless the population can pay for private cars that can be paid tax cars.
Nowaday the
population
uses
private
cars
. There are
a lot of
problems.
Moreover
traffic is the main problem of the
government
even though
it has
public
transportation
. This essay will examine both these statements of advantages and disadvantages of
taxing
private
cars
and
use
the money to
improve
public
transportation.
On the one hand, the
government
should
improve
public
transportation
due to the fact that they want
people
to decrease the
use
of
private
cars
.
Additionally
cars
produce an effect on air pollution such as carbon dioxide and carbon monoxide which cause global warming.
For instance
, if the
population
adopts
public
transportation
in lieu of
private
cars
it can
reduce
carbon dioxide approximately 13% in air.
That is
the advantage of
taxing
private
cars.
On the other hand
, a method should
tax
private
car
owners
heavily
to affect business about
cars
and citizens.
Firstly
the citizens paid an amount to
tax
private
cars
. Second It will has effect to automotive industry
because
of
population
shall diminished
buy
cars
.
For example
if
government
should
taxing
increased 10% by
car
therefore
citizens have expenditure more than
usually
10%. That
is caused
for determine choose
buy
car
.
That is
the disadvantage of
taxing
private
cars.
In conclusion
, I
strongly
believe that the
government
should
tax
private
cars
which is a
good
idea
. Due to the fact it had the advantage more than the disadvantage in improving
public
transportation
and developing the environment.
Nevertheless
the
population
can pay for
private
cars
that can
be paid
tax
cars
.
Do not write below this line