brodcatsing of news is sloley on the hand of news editior.

From broadcasting on screen to printing press, editor made their decision on what should be released or pressed daily on newspaper. I think it is difficult to decide on it but as far as I know, they are influenced by relevant and truthful news and sometimes just to attract audience in sake of popularity. In my opinion, we are not used to bitter news because it always hurt to listen or see terrible news. But it became common to hear such things nowadays. For instance, when we turn on the television, we can expect some bad thing happening outside the world whether it is about natural disaster or accidents or the clashes between countries or civil war. There is always something to catch up about bad things. I think it would be better, to listen more good news as it spreads positivity in surroundings and makes people feel safer. But this won’t be the case every time, bad things happen as much as good things will happen. In such scenario, still positivity can be spread by showing the positive side of the situation, ignoring the bad impact and hatred towards it. For example, it is not wise to put catchy title which focus more on irrevelent news, rather meaningful words can be written. It would be happier place and care free people whole over the world, if media spreads more on positivity not only to attract the audience for the purpose of being popular. In conclusion, media shouldn’t be influenced by the popularity rather work as an agent to spread positivity and truthful news.