In a number of countries, some people think it is necessary to spend large sums of money on constructing new railway lines between cities. Others believe that money should be spent on improving existing public transport. Discuss both these views and give your own opinion.

Government expenditure on railways and public transit, nowadays, seems to have aroused controversy. Some believe that government expenditure should be spent on fresh railway lines for the sake of intercity shipping; however, others insist that this budget should be employed for current transport systems. There are valid opinions on both sides, which requires our in-depth analysis. On the one hand, there are some reasons why intercity rails for bullet trains are the requisites of developed countries. One frequently cited motive is that trains are the fastest mode of travel. Even though one might envisage that air travel is by far the fastest of them all, the truth of the matter is airport procedures waste a considerable time, in stark contrast to railway trains that passengers get to their destination quicker. For instance, people will be more able to conduct business and visit relatives than they have in the past when they needed to be able to afford a plane ticket or endure a long and uncomfortable journey by bus or slow train. Hence, it is crucial that we grasp the fact that a high-speed transit system is a matter of necessity. On the other hand, why should the disbursement of funds be spent on refining existing mass transit? First, a clean environment may hold some of the answers. It is a well-established fact that adequate and efficient mass transportation services play an important role in combating the ever-worsening problems of traffic congestion and air pollution. The more rapidly the population grows, the more urban travel is demanded by citizens, and in London, if the infrastructure of public transport had not been improved they would have had contentious issues, for example. In conclusion, by and large, it is evident from the above discussions that the public transit of the rustic must be well established before carrying out plans to expand connections with surrounding cities; nevertheless, funds must be deployed to improve prevailing public transport.