in a global economy, many goods, including what we use on a daily basis, are transported from other countries in a long distances. To what extent do you think its benefits exceed its drawbacks?

It is taken for granted that governments ought to shoulder the responsibility to come up with solutions to supply daily requirements of their citizens. Surely some of materials are not produced locally, therefore all nations are forced to import them, despite it has some drawbacks, its benefits can be more. Importing from other countries that are far from different destinations are needed huge sum of money. Nowadays, use of fossil fuel is extremely expensive that will eventuate in high transportation costs. In addition exchange rate had direct influence of final gross price of the products, for instance societies with low value of rate such as Afghanistan have to pay more money in compare with other countries such as European if they both want to import from China. Although its disadvantages, supplying wide ranges of products, taken as a whole, have compelling reasons which cause to outweigh its drawbacks. Absolutely production costs in tandem with lack of natural resources as water, electric and so on are major preoccupation of authorities for furnishing daily requirements of each specials nation that make importing irreplaceable. Actually, the likelihood of spending lower costs in import of goods is certainly obvious. It plausibly is clear that millions of products are cheaper to import rather to be produced. Moreover given the quality of products would be another example of its benefits. It should be noted that meeting the needs of inhabitants are the main issue for governments so sometimes purchasing from international market has some pros which can not be condoned.