Government investment in the visual arts, the kind you commonly see in art galleries, is a waste of money. Governments must invest this money in public services instead. To what extent do you agree with this statement?

It is a fact that visual art is considered one of the most significant demand in a society. It is a must for any governmrnt to set aside a certain budget in order to support art galleries and give them a chance of promotion, but it is noticeable that there are a bunch of people who think it is not only wasting money but also contributes to ignore the importance of public services. It is worth noting that a noticeable part of society ask the government to invest more in public services instead of wasting budgets in the visual art. They believe promoting services in divers part of country are more vital. As the people engage with so many facilities which some of them need to be repaired or replaced oe even in some cases requir to be completly exchange with newest modus. when the government takes into consideration the importance of art and spreading over country, it may cause to encounter shortage of budgets as well as loosing priorities and neglecting basic people's requirnments. The upon view seems to be a little harsh. Actually it is unfair to be ignored the significance of art in a society. The role of art in human's spirit and body is as highlited as material supplies. Living in a atmosphere which is lack of spiritual items and aesthetic aspects is impossible. The peaople's soul need to be feeded. Also it is a must for any government to support and fund artistic skill and talents. This is absurd to stop growing artist in society. To sum up, Both public services and protection of visual art are critical for any nation. As each one plays their own role to keep the life alive. the only factor have to be considered by the governmemt is the balance and steady.