further education fees should be free
further education fees should be free 60Ybx
In some countries, tuition fees are on the rise at a time when some students are suffering from a lack of money to pay for university. However, many critics claim that those who are willing to study should be supplied with free schooling. In this essay, I will examine both sides of this argument and try to reach a conclusion.
There are some advantages of making university education free of cost. Firstly, there are many students who do not try to study at university due to the expenditure that they cannot bear. As a result, far more pupils are seen in primary or secondary school than in undergraduate or postgraduate level. If such education was ensured, not only would they support their family, but they would also become a useful asset to their country. Moreover, making this type of education free means they do not have to worry about their educational costs. They can give their whole attention to their study and thus, reach their academic ambitions. Therefore, ensuring such a scheme could be rewarding for both the current and prospective students.
Nevertheless, establishing free tertiary education would certainly have an impact on the university. This is because universities pay their staff through the earnings that they make from the fees. If the plan of free education is implemented, it will be hard for universities to operate their normal educational activities, which may result in the closure of many universities. In addition, some students could take advantage of this situation. For example, as it is free, they would try to stay at this level for a long period without worrying about the future.
In conclusion, although this type of educational institution without fees can ensure schooling to all students, the consequences that this institution has to carry due to this outweigh the benefits. Therefore, in my view, this level of education should be made free only for the poor students.
In
some
countries, tuition fees are on the rise at a time when
some
students
are suffering from a lack of money to pay for
university
.
However
,
many
critics claim that those who are willing to study should
be supplied
with
free
schooling. In this essay, I will examine both sides of this argument and try to reach a conclusion.
There are
some
advantages of making
university
education
free
of cost.
Firstly
, there are
many
students
who do not try to study at
university
due to the expenditure that they cannot bear.
As a result
, far more pupils are
seen
in primary or secondary school than in undergraduate or postgraduate level. If such
education
was ensured
, not
only
would they support their family,
but
they would
also
become a useful asset to their country.
Moreover
, making this type of
education
free
means they do not
have to
worry about their educational costs. They can give their whole attention to their study and
thus
, reach their academic ambitions.
Therefore
, ensuring such a scheme could be rewarding for both the
current
and prospective students.
Nevertheless
, establishing
free
tertiary
education
would
certainly
have an impact on the
university
. This is
because
universities
pay their staff through the earnings that they
make
from the fees. If the plan of
free
education
is implemented
, it will be
hard
for
universities
to operate their normal educational activities, which may result in the closure of
many
universities
.
In addition
,
some
students
could take advantage of this situation.
For example
, as it is
free
, they would try to stay at this level for a long period without worrying about the future.
In conclusion
, although this type of educational institution without fees can ensure schooling to all
students
, the consequences that this institution
has to
carry due to this outweigh the benefits.
Therefore
, in my view, this level of
education
should
be made
free
only
for the poor
students
.
Do not write below this line