Environmental problems such as pollution and climate change affect all the people in the world. Although global decisions are made to reduce these problems, the solutions are not effective. Why are the solutions ineffective? How can these problems be solved?

In the contemporary era, almost every person in the world is affected by the nature issues like ÷ pollution, global warming. However, international decisions are implemented to solve these problems but the remedies are ineffective. I will discuss the causes of why it is not effective and give my perspective how people will overcome from this situation. The most predominant reason that supports the notion is that some countries do not have enough funds for enhancing their environment. To simplify, almost every country depend on a cheap resources such as coal, petrol, and diesel which create a huge amount of pollution. If, government implement on people to use a clean fuel like electricity which is quite expensive for poor countries which they cannot afford. Therefore, they cannot clean the atmosphere. Another is that burden on politicians who has motive to clean the nature. Because when any politicians made decisions in a favour of nature but public do not accept their decision because they think that it will give lead impact on them. After that, they protest on their decisions. Even they do not want to change their decision but they force to change decision. Turning towards the fruitful solution, the first and foremost notion is that developed countries should help undeveloped nations. They should give funds to poor countries which spend on environment. Other factor is that, famous personalities should aware their fans who are unaware of nature importance. To conclude that, there is no skepticism that funds play a vital role in clearing atmosphere. Government should give the extra money to poor countries which have not capibilty to improve their environment.