culture and art should be encouraged or not

In this era of integration, countries can easily cooperate with each other in numerous aspects to develop. Cultures and art play a crucial role in understanding other nations, There are controversial beliefs about whether the government should pour money into them or not. In my opinion, although the investments in art and culture seem to be high to some extent, I believe they can bring to that country greater benefits. It is understandable why there are some individuals who think that the money spent on the conservation and development of various kinds of artworks and culture is not low. Specifically, millions of dollars can be spent on the preservation of some worldwide masterpieces or architectures. For instance, funding can be used for buying specialized machines to control the suitable temperature to ensure that the painting is not in ruin or mending the large number of sculptures in the museum. And that investment can be used for other purposes like environment, poverty, or hunger. Nevertheless, this idea is short-sighted Moreover, there are various advantages of culture and art to society. In other words, the largest benefit easily can be seen is that a huge amount of money from tourism and advertisements can not only encourage local people to continue preserving their culture, and artworks but also bring currency to that nation. Thanks to tradition and art, more and more foreign travelers come to preservation areas, they spend money on various kinds of goods, which helps to enhance local people's life and that nation’s economy. In reality, there are a plethora of countries that develop their tourism in the direction of cultural externalization and they can experience a high living standard in citizens’ life. To sum up, the maintenance of culture and artwork not only assists local individuals to improve their living standards but also makes the nation's economy grow so it is vital for the government to consider this problem in a more careful way.