The true projection of classical works of literature in movies as compared to books has always been the point of discussion. Some people think that literature work cannot be successfully presented in a movie, while others maintain that work of literature can be easily produced and picturized. This essay will discuss that why whether the art work can be effectively produced on screens.
Firstly, to translate and relay literature work on screen requires extreme experience. Therefore, owing to the sophistication of the work professionals exercise extreme care. Moreover, people involved in such activity do not possess any kind of real life experience of classics, hence they need to have strong imaginative and creative skills in order to attract a large number of audience. Resultantly, this delicate and highly skilled work can be projected on screen by artists utilizing their professional acumen.
On the other hand, art media workers are required to create a complete picture and plot line unlike as specified in the books. Filming of books has proved to be quite easy as the writer of the book uses his complete innate skills to transfer the real picture to the reader. Afterwards, entertainment world can utilize the writer’s skill and transform it to project on the screen. As an example, filming of books like Harry potter has proved to be easier than projecting historical scenes from movies like Troy. As a result, it is quite evident that projection of books onto cinema screens is easier than displaying complex art and literature works.
In conclusion, this essay has discussed with extreme care art and literature work can be easily projected onto the screens of cinema.
Getting entertained through movies has always been preferred more as compared to reading books. With this thought, adoption of literature in movies has become a controversial topic for its true projection. My essay will discuss both sides of the argument followed by my opinion.
At the outset, translating classic literature needs to be handled delicately. Literature is not written in a day or two and has emerged from the writers’ deep feelings. To present those feelings, movie makers must be dexterous in their fields. Many examples have been seen where directors and producers proved their expertise by showing the true emotions of the works including “King Lear” and “The Brother Sisters”. Moreover, audience find themselves engrossed more in screen than reading books for hours. As per the reviews, people liked the transformation.
However, over dramatization is a concern while turning books into movies. In other words, in order to earn more profit movie makers, exaggerate the plot and put some unwanted elements into it like songs and some dialogues. Besides, the real essence of the novels is not only based on characters but includes various figures of speech such as metaphors, similes, personification and so on which are hard to picturize on screen. A relevant example of this is Sidhartha which is written so beautifully that a reader can visualize the events in his mind but the movie failed to capture that feel.
To conclude, picturing literature is an appreciable effort as it introduces people to classic work but that require a special care too.
The true projection of classical works of
literature
in
movies
as compared to
books
has always been the point of discussion.
Some
people
think
that
literature
work
cannot be
successfully
presented in a
movie
, while others maintain that
work
of
literature
can be
easily
produced and picturized. This essay will discuss that why whether the
art
work
can be
effectively
produced on screens.
Firstly
, to translate and relay
literature
work
on
screen
requires extreme experience.
Therefore
, owing to the sophistication of the
work
professionals exercise extreme care.
Moreover
,
people
involved in such activity do not possess any kind of real life experience of classics,
hence
they need to have strong imaginative and creative
skills
in order to attract
a large number of
audience.
Resultantly
, this delicate and
highly
skilled
work
can
be projected
on
screen
by artists utilizing their professional acumen.
On the other hand
,
art
media workers
are required
to create a complete picture and plot line unlike as specified in the
books
. Filming of
books
has proved to be quite easy as the writer of the
book
uses
his complete innate
skills
to transfer the real picture to the reader. Afterwards, entertainment world can utilize the writer’s
skill
and transform it to project on the
screen
. As an example, filming of
books
like
Harry potter
has proved to be easier than projecting historical scenes from
movies
like Troy.
As a result
, it is quite evident that projection of
books
onto cinema
screens
is easier than displaying complex
art
and
literature
works.
In conclusion
, this essay has discussed with extreme care
art
and
literature
work
can be
easily
projected onto the
screens
of cinema.
Getting entertained through
movies
has always
been preferred
more
as
compared to reading
books
. With this
thought
, adoption of
literature
in
movies
has become a controversial topic for its true projection. My essay will discuss both sides of the argument followed by my opinion.
At the outset, translating classic
literature
needs to
be handled
delicately
.
Literature
is not written in a day or two and has emerged from the writers’ deep feelings. To present those feelings,
movie
makers
must
be dexterous in their fields.
Many
examples have been
seen
where directors and producers proved their expertise by showing the true emotions of the works including “King Lear” and “The Brother Sisters”.
Moreover
, audience find themselves engrossed more in
screen
than reading
books
for hours. As per the reviews,
people
liked the transformation.
However
, over dramatization is a concern while turning
books
into
movies
.
In other words
, in order to earn more profit
movie
makers, exaggerate the plot and put
some
unwanted elements into it like songs and
some
dialogues.
Besides
, the real essence of the novels is not
only
based on characters
but
includes various figures of speech such as metaphors, similes, personification and
so
on which are
hard
to picturize on
screen
. A relevant example of this is
Sidhartha
which
is written
so
beautifully
that a reader can visualize the
events
in his mind
but
the
movie
failed to capture that feel.
To conclude
, picturing
literature
is an appreciable effort as it introduces
people
to classic
work
but
that require a special care too.