Both governments and individuals are spending vast amounts of money protecting animals and their habitat. This money could be better spent dealing with fundamental issues in society such as poverty and health care. To what extent do you agree?

Countries and populations usually allocate money for protecting animal and their habitat while some ones believe that should spend this budget for social problem like for the poor or health care. In this essay, I support for idea above, but government should allocate money for both this issue. There are many reasons why human had to raise the fund to help the environment and species. Firstly, human is destroying environment seriously, they damage forest and hunt the rare animal, so a number of species could not find food and place to live. This problem leads to some kind of animal is facing to danger of extinction. For example, the number of polar bear and white crocodile are less in the present because lack of food and be people hunt too much, and biological imbalance is result in extinction. On the other hand, some type of animal is use to create medicine in medical, so if they disappear, few patent might not be save. Nevertheless, community issue should be pay by the government, special poverty and medical service. One of the reasons is poverty might rase the rate of crime. Because the poor people could not earn enough money for their life, they tend to commit crime such as theft or murder so cause the danger for social. In other word, when the health care system not be expenditure by government, the quality will reduce and not enough facilities and medicine lead to decrease in life span, so population drop, too. In conclusion, I agree with that pay for protecting animal and their habitat. However, government and people should balance the financial for environment and crucial factor of social.