Topic: Some people think that the best way to reduce time spent travelling to work is to replace parks and gardens close to the city with apartment buildings for commuters, but others disagree. Discussion both views and give your own opinion.

People have different views about whether people have to spend more and more time traveling to work and from work because of the expansion of metropolises. Although it can be argued that the parks and gardens were demolished to make room for the apartment building, I am of the opinion that people should take more consideration of this idea. On one side of the argument, there are people who believe that the parks and gardens standing rights on the side of where the apartment building used to be is the best solution. There are several reasons. Firstly, people who can save a large amount of time to work because living in the apartment building do not have to spend too much time on traveling. Secondly, they can even walk to their offices. As a result, the rate of traffic jams are reduced in big cities. I do not think these stand up to scrutiny as I am of the opinion that the locals and workers might be bothered by other things. There are many reasons that lead me to believe this. First of all, numerous people live just near the center, it could lead to overcrowding. Because many people live in a limited space. Another reason is that people still need parks and gardens for entertainment on the weekends since the parks or gardens are regarded as a hive of activities, and represent sports such as football, volleyball, and so on. In conclusion, there is a strong argument for and against the parks and gardens were replaced by the apartment building. Nevertheless, I maintain my original position that people should take more consideration of this idea.