The funds for postgraduate research are limited; therefore some people think that the government should provide financial support. In their opinion, only scientific research should be funded, rather than other less useful subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree?

In this modern era, eduction is vital role in everyone's life. The importance of education which is always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This eassy wll be highlight that this creatainly is a rational apporach that need to be opted. There are a number of argument in favour of government should be provided more financial support for scientists research. The most perpondent is one that research can not only contribute to it but also lead to a numerous othee benefits in various fileds. Thanks to a wide range of advantages it offers one can get benefits more when it comes to being effective. In addition, it also enhance the productivity and quality of their lives easie? effective and convenience. For example, in USA, state executed are spend money on scientific research such as teaching of science, building new laboratory, and many more. Hence, government should help in scientists research. Another pivotal aspect of aforementioned properties is that it is only likely to help one thrive and excel in varied areas. Besides only when one follws such as system they can broaden their horizones thus learning such as essential attributes as responsibility dedication and preserverance. To give clear example, in all world government should be financial support in researching as well as some important subject. Therefore, we should no ignore the status other in our education system. To sum it up, according to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of government funding of postgraduate research should focus on science are indeed to great.