Some people say that it is necessary to use animals for testing medicines intended for human use. Others, however, think it is cruel and unnecessary. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

Currently, the medical industry plays a vital part in human existence such as medicines and vaccines. Although scientists have tested any treatment on animals before using on human, some argue this is a harsh and needless approach, but others believe it is critical to test any treatment on animals to ensure that it is safe for everyone. The following essay looks both sides of the argument. On the one hand, somebody consider that researchers have no qualms about testing medications on beast and they have their standpoint. One of them is that mammals, like humans, are living entities. Furthermore, they have spirits and feel pain in the same way that they do. Those individuals have the right to refuse this system; yet it is the most effective way to ensure that this therapy is acceptable for humans. We implore doctors to test medications in additional trials to spare the lives of animals. On the other hand, others suppose that testing medications or vaccinations on animals is crucial, especially if there is a lethal virus or sickness. Individuals were afflicted in a few years ago, and many perished as a result due to scientists developed a treatment for it, which they initially tested on mice. Researchers obviously believe in sacrifice with beast rather than people because their occupations include saving people's lives. Because of the physical similarities between animals and humans, this is a essential step before putting any drug on them. In conclusion, academics are the only ones who can choose whether to participate in this process. Animals are unquestionably employed in medical experimentation as the proposals' goal. We need to save all the someone life as we could to.