Salaries and payment of money
Salaries and payment of money 29B9x
Some people argue that salaries should increase according of the workers productivity, others think that this amount has to be determined by the difficulty of the task. Currently, every year, enormous enterprices provide good increments in the salary of their directors, by contrast, the average worker receive a more less increase in their payment; managers guess that the previous fact have the intention to attract the best staff. However, I totally disagree with the previous statement, and with this essay I will expose the reasons of my argument.
Firstly, talented workers are not attracted only for a big amount of money. Many of them search opportunities to develop their abbilities therefore to get experience for fill a better CV. As a matter of fact, large amounts of professionals want to work for a recognized company. For instance, I have a friend that prefers change his job to get a contract with Coca Cola. Due to the previous statement, I guess that money it is not the unique fact that make a vacant attractive.
Secondly, on one hand, I suppose that managers want to justify their increases beacuse they do not worry about both wellness and personal development of their workers. On the other hand, they dislike the obligation of provide good work conditions. In Colombia, it is possible see how companies reduce these duties offering negative contracts and fewer salaries than administrative scale. For that reason, I think that managers only think in themselves.
To sum up, the general perception of salaries scale vary between average workers and managers. First of all, managers think that money is relevant to get agreements with talented workers, nevertheless, that is not the only factor that attracts more people to a company. In addition, there is a feeling unemphatic by managers to their workers. The arguments below make me disagree.
Some
people
argue that
salaries
should increase according of the
workers
productivity, others
think
that this amount
has to
be determined
by the difficulty of the task.
Currently
, every year, enormous enterprices provide
good
increments in the
salary
of their directors, by contrast, the average
worker
receive a more less increase in their payment;
managers
guess that the previous fact have the intention to attract the best staff.
However
, I
totally
disagree with the previous statement, and with this essay I will expose the reasons of my argument.
Firstly
, talented
workers
are not attracted
only
for a
big
amount of money.
Many
of them search opportunities to develop their abbilities
therefore
to
get
experience for fill a better CV. As a matter of fact, large amounts of professionals want to work for a recognized
company
.
For instance
, I have a friend that prefers
change
his job to
get
a contract with Coca Cola. Due to the previous statement, I guess that money it is not the unique fact that
make
a vacant attractive.
Secondly
, on one hand, I suppose that
managers
want to justify their increases beacuse they do not worry about both wellness and personal development of their
workers
.
On the other hand
, they dislike the obligation of provide
good
work conditions. In Colombia, it is possible
see
how
companies
reduce
these duties offering
negative
contracts and fewer
salaries
than administrative scale. For that reason, I
think
that
managers
only
think
in themselves.
To sum up, the general perception of
salaries
scale vary between average
workers
and
managers
.
First
of all,
managers
think
that money is relevant to
get
agreements with talented
workers
,
nevertheless
,
that is
not the
only
factor that attracts more
people
to a
company
.
In addition
, there is a feeling unemphatic by
managers
to their
workers
. The arguments below
make
me disagree.
Do not write below this line