More and more food processing companies are moving toward reducing the number of genetically-modified (GM) ingredients in their products as a result of consumer anger. Many consumers feel that GM products are unhealthy. What are some positive and negative aspects of GM products? Do you think food manufacturers should limit the use of GM ingredients in their products? Why, or why not?
More and more food processing companies are moving toward reducing the number of genetically-modified (GM) ingredients in their products as a result of consumer anger. Many consumers feel that GM products are unhealthy. What are some positive and negative aspects of GM products? Do you think food manufacturers should limit the use of GM ingredients in their products? Why, or why not? GWL
With technological innovations come both beneficial and harmful effects. For example, by using gene modification scientists today can increase crop yields and raise larger cattle to feed the masses. However, while this technology provides an overall benefit, one must also consider its negative consequences.
On the positive side, genetically-modified (GM) foods allow farmers to increase the output of their products. This has two beneficial outcomes for food processors: firstly, it allows the producers to increase their profits, which in turn reduces costs for the consumer; secondly, an increased crop yield or meatier cattle ensures that the population has ample food supplies. In Asia, for instance, scientists have been able to produce rice grains whose yield is four to five times greater than what had been the case before GM production. This means that as the population grows, food supplies are able to keep up with consumer demand.
On the other hand, GM foods are a relatively new phenomenon whose long-term health
effects have not had a chance to clearly manifest themselves. Many consumers believe that tampering with nature leads to illnesses; in fact, surveys indicate that many people relate the rise in global virus and cancer epidemics to the increased consumption of GM foods. They believe that hormone injections and other chemical and biological additives decrease one’s natural ability to fight diseases. Though this view is debatable, food manufacturers should pay attention to the opinions of their customers, who, in turn, should allow more time and research to present a clearer picture of the risks involved with GM foods.
In conclusion, until more evidence is available that clearly demonstrates the negative effects of consuming GM foods, I believe these products serve a positive role as we witness a growing global population. As such, food producers should only limit these products’ use to the extent that they do not alienate consumers. 
With technological innovations 
come
 both beneficial and harmful effects. 
For example
, by using gene modification scientists 
today
 can increase crop yields and raise larger cattle to feed the masses. 
However
, while this technology provides an 
overall
 benefit, one 
must
 also
 consider its 
negative
 consequences.
On the 
positive
 side, 
genetically
-modified (GM) 
foods
 allow
 farmers to increase the output of their products. This has two beneficial outcomes for 
food
 processors: 
firstly
, it 
allows
 the producers to increase their profits, which in turn 
reduces
 costs for the 
consumer
; 
secondly
, an increased crop yield or meatier cattle ensures that the population has ample 
food
 supplies. In Asia, 
for instance
, scientists have been able to produce rice grains whose yield is four to five times greater than what had been the case 
before
 GM production. This means that as the population grows, 
food
 supplies are able to 
keep
 up with 
consumer
 demand.
On the other hand
, GM 
foods
 are a 
relatively
 new phenomenon whose long-term health
effects have not had a chance to 
clearly
 manifest themselves. 
Many
 consumers
 believe that tampering with nature leads to illnesses; in fact, surveys indicate that 
many
 people
 relate the rise in global virus and cancer epidemics to the increased consumption of GM 
foods
. They believe that hormone injections and other chemical and biological additives decrease one’s natural ability to fight diseases. Though this view is debatable, 
food
 manufacturers should pay attention to the opinions of their customers, who, in turn, should 
allow
 more time and research to present a clearer picture of the 
risks
 involved with GM foods.
In conclusion
, until more evidence is available that 
clearly
 demonstrates the 
negative
 effects of consuming GM 
foods
, I believe these products serve a 
positive
 role as we witness a growing global population. As such, 
food
 producers should 
only
 limit these products’ 
use
 to the extent that they do not alienate 
consumers
. 
Do not write below this line