More and more food processing companies are moving toward reducing the number of genetically-modified (GM) ingredients in their products as a result of consumer anger. Many consumers feel that GM products are unhealthy. What are some positive and negative aspects of GM products? Do you think food manufacturers should limit the use of GM ingredients in their products? Why, or why not?
More and more food processing companies are moving toward reducing the number of genetically-modified (GM) ingredients in their products as a result of consumer anger. Many consumers feel that GM products are unhealthy. What are some positive and negative aspects of GM products? Do you think food manufacturers should limit the use of GM ingredients in their products? Why, or why not? GWL
With technological innovations come both beneficial and harmful effects. For example, by using gene modification scientists today can increase crop yields and raise larger cattle to feed the masses. However, while this technology provides an overall benefit, one must also consider its negative consequences.
On the positive side, genetically-modified (GM) foods allow farmers to increase the output of their products. This has two beneficial outcomes for food processors: firstly, it allows the producers to increase their profits, which in turn reduces costs for the consumer; secondly, an increased crop yield or meatier cattle ensures that the population has ample food supplies. In Asia, for instance, scientists have been able to produce rice grains whose yield is four to five times greater than what had been the case before GM production. This means that as the population grows, food supplies are able to keep up with consumer demand.
On the other hand, GM foods are a relatively new phenomenon whose long-term health
effects have not had a chance to clearly manifest themselves. Many consumers believe that tampering with nature leads to illnesses; in fact, surveys indicate that many people relate the rise in global virus and cancer epidemics to the increased consumption of GM foods. They believe that hormone injections and other chemical and biological additives decrease one’s natural ability to fight diseases. Though this view is debatable, food manufacturers should pay attention to the opinions of their customers, who, in turn, should allow more time and research to present a clearer picture of the risks involved with GM foods.
In conclusion, until more evidence is available that clearly demonstrates the negative effects of consuming GM foods, I believe these products serve a positive role as we witness a growing global population. As such, food producers should only limit these products’ use to the extent that they do not alienate consumers.
With technological innovations
come
both beneficial and harmful effects.
For example
, by using gene modification scientists
today
can increase crop yields and raise larger cattle to feed the masses.
However
, while this technology provides an
overall
benefit, one
must
also
consider its
negative
consequences.
On the
positive
side,
genetically
-modified (GM)
foods
allow
farmers to increase the output of their products. This has two beneficial outcomes for
food
processors:
firstly
, it
allows
the producers to increase their profits, which in turn
reduces
costs for the
consumer
;
secondly
, an increased crop yield or meatier cattle ensures that the population has ample
food
supplies. In Asia,
for instance
, scientists have been able to produce rice grains whose yield is four to five times greater than what had been the case
before
GM production. This means that as the population grows,
food
supplies are able to
keep
up with
consumer
demand.
On the other hand
, GM
foods
are a
relatively
new phenomenon whose long-term health
effects have not had a chance to
clearly
manifest themselves.
Many
consumers
believe that tampering with nature leads to illnesses; in fact, surveys indicate that
many
people
relate the rise in global virus and cancer epidemics to the increased consumption of GM
foods
. They believe that hormone injections and other chemical and biological additives decrease one’s natural ability to fight diseases. Though this view is debatable,
food
manufacturers should pay attention to the opinions of their customers, who, in turn, should
allow
more time and research to present a clearer picture of the
risks
involved with GM foods.
In conclusion
, until more evidence is available that
clearly
demonstrates the
negative
effects of consuming GM
foods
, I believe these products serve a
positive
role as we witness a growing global population. As such,
food
producers should
only
limit these products’
use
to the extent that they do not alienate
consumers
.
Do not write below this line