Moon landing changes mankind life vs made a little change

Space exploration has fascinated humankind since the early 1900s, when writers created novels and silent movies about exploring the moon. Finally, in the 1960s, mankind achieved that lofty goal, but since then, a schism has formed: either moon travel elevated human life or lunar exploration offered little impact. With these viewpoints in mind, this essay will tackle each vantage point but ultimately side with the view that the moon voyage improved humanity’s way of life. Traveling to the moon embodies extreme challenges, but the benefits paid off in equal measure. A litany of improvements to society's lifestyle ensued after the successful lunar journey: digital flight control, food safety protocols, shock absorbers, computer coding, memory foam, tracking, and achieving the once impossible dream. This last point, the inconceivable dream, explains this essay's strong position favoring moon travel as a boon to the average person. For example, moon-inspired scientists realized even more unthinkable, immensely culture-changing aspirations since astronauts blasted off in rockets to Earth's closest planetary body, including smartphones, the internet, and portable computers. Although the stronger viewpoint favors the lunar landing as a windfall bonanza of growth, the opposing view warrants discussion. There are some who argue that landing on the moon had only a minor impact on daily life. These rationalizations typically fall under the category of resolving problems closer to home, such as poverty, racism, and starvation. If we examine the world today, one could contend that these blights on humanity still exist somewhat, even if in a more robust measure than in 1960. For example, in 2021, the George Floyd national racism protest raged across America. Be that as it may, this reasoning does not carry enough weight since moon-led inventions improved social warriors' abilities to report, reveal, change, and comment on problems closer to home. Despite unresolved societal problems, the position of little change does not stand up against the onslaught of improvements derived from moon travel. In the future, humans should travel to the moon and resolve human grief in equal measure and at equal cost.