Many puplic libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their fucntions. Do you argee or disagree ?
Many puplic libraries is a waste of money since computer technology can replace their fucntions. Do you argee or disagree? jp0n1
With the development of technology, many traditional books in the library which are high cost of maintenance are gradually replaced by online books on the computer. In my opinion, I totally agree with the argument online libraries over public libraries for some reasons.
Firstly, using online sources can reduce the library operation cost and store a huge amount of information that is more performance than traditional libraries. By using websites to store books, they will not use a lot of money for buying a house, bookcases, chairs and tables for a physical library. Storage books online are not limited, but with traditional libraries they have to take money to expand more space for storage. In some countries in Europe, digital libraries are very common and replace physical libraries by the year and maybe in the future, traditional libraries will disappear in these developing countries. But online libraries have a disadvantage is that it can be easily stolen by hackers.
Nextly, with a smartphone or laptop, researchers can easily read a book every time, everywhere instead of going to libraries which can only be open during several hours per day and the cost of hiring a paper book is more expensive than digital book. For people who take full time a day to work or learning and just want to read books whenever they get free time, online libraries are an ideal way for them. Besides, people can easily find their favorite books by searching on websites and it takes around 1 minute instead of going to the library looking for a lot of books in bookcases that take an hour.
In conclusion, I agree that physical libraries will be replaced by digital websites because the cost of maintenance websites are cheaper and more convenient compared with traditional libraries.
With the development of technology,
many
traditional
books
in the library which are high
cost
of maintenance are
gradually
replaced by
online
books
on the computer. In my opinion, I
totally
agree
with the argument
online
libraries over public libraries for
some
reasons.
Firstly
, using
online
sources can
reduce
the library operation
cost
and store a huge amount of information
that is
more performance than
traditional
libraries. By using websites to store
books
, they will not
use
a lot of
money for buying a
house
, bookcases, chairs and tables for a physical library. Storage
books
online
are not limited,
but
with
traditional
libraries they
have to
take money to expand more space for storage. In
some
countries in Europe, digital libraries are
very
common and replace physical libraries by the year and maybe in the future,
traditional
libraries will disappear in these
developing countries
.
But
online
libraries have a disadvantage is that it can be
easily
stolen by hackers.
Nextly
, with a smartphone or laptop, researchers can
easily
read a
book
every time, everywhere
instead
of going to libraries which can
only
be open during several hours per day and the
cost
of hiring a paper
book
is more expensive than digital
book
. For
people
who take full time a day to work or learning and
just
want to read
books
whenever they
get
free time,
online
libraries are an ideal way for them.
Besides
,
people
can
easily
find their favorite
books
by searching on websites and it takes around 1 minute
instead
of going to the library looking for
a lot of
books
in bookcases that take an hour.
In conclusion
, I
agree
that physical libraries will
be replaced
by digital websites
because
the
cost
of maintenance websites are cheaper and more convenient compared with
traditional
libraries.
Do not write below this line