Many people believe that university students should study a full range of subjects, instead of some specific subjects. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this viewpoint? Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.

Nowadays, a large number of students go to the universities after graduating school and some people believe that we shouldn’t study a full scale of subjects, because we had all this subjects in the school. As I consider, students should learn only specific subjects linked with their future profession. The major cause is there are no needs in the full range of subjects, because we should study them in the school. I think, that universities are intended for professional education and learning subjects, which will not be useful in the future, is total waste of time. Universities’ students would spend a lot of time and energy for subjects, which are not important for them. For instance, student is going to art university, he demands in professional education that will make him an artist, but he also need to spend time on mathematic, that he studied in school and will be useless for him. I believe, people should do what they do best and the universities have to help students reach their full potential. Nevertheless, I admit that studying a full specter of subjects is not bad, indeed it improves people’s worldview. However, schools give us necessary knowledge base and only colleges may include all subjects in their educational program, since people go to college are not graduating from high school. Therefore, to a certain degree I consent that students should study a complete range of subjects, but if only someone didn’t graduate from high school. In summary, I believe that students should study professional subjects with one condition, they should finish whole school course, otherwise they have to learn all subjects.