In some countries, advertisers increase the amount of advertising which try to persuade children to buy snacks, toys and other goods. Parents object to such pressure on children. But some advertisers claim that there is useful information in these advertisements. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

In the contemporary era, there is a heated argument over the issue that unethical advertisements are used to attract children. A lion’s share of society favors it, however, the rest are averse to it. The following paragraph would shed light on both sides of this argument and then I will give my perspective. There is the myriad reason which will be shared its favor. First and Foremost, children are more likely to be influenced by non-factual aspects of advertising than adults. Most children are likely to enjoy snacks, candies, or toys. Therefore, most of the advertisement content is interesting which makes children nag about it to parents. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that if children enjoy and play with these kinds of food or toys advertised in the media, it may have negative impacts on the physical development of children as well as their health. On the other hand, it can be directly seen that most advertisements these days are intended to persuade viewers, especially children, to make more purchases than they need. Some products for kids have new features and attractive designs, but these are not necessary for their life. These marketing and commercial activities have certain effects by creating greater commercial impulse and making young children insist on asking their parents to buy those things for them. Hammering the last nail, I am on the option that advertisers should decrease the number of advertisements aimed at children, and parents need to be concerned about how advertisements affect their children.