In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss and give your own opinion.
In many countries, good schools and medical facilities are available only in cities. some people think new teachers and doctors should work in rural areas for a few years, but others think everyone should be free to choose where they work. Discuss and give your own opinion. 52G3N
As a big gap is there between the urban and rural areas, some people opine that teachers and doctors, who
are fresh out of college, should work in villages for a few years. However, others believe that the choice of
where to work should be left on the teachers and doctors. ln this essay, I shall discuss the merits and
demerits of both approaches and finally give my opinton.
There are many advantages of having teachers and doctors work in rural areas. Firstly, the people in the
villages will have access to medical care and education, which they are deprived of normally. Secondly, it
would be good for the teachers and doctors, who are fresh from university to translate their theoretical
knowledge into practice. ln urban areas there are already so many experienced teachers and doctors.
Therefore, people would naturally not opt for the fresh graduates. ln a rural setting, they would gain a lot
of confidence very early on in their career. Finally, a few of these doctors and teachers may choose to live
permanently in those villages to serve humanity.
On the other hand, this compulsory policy may have some negative effects. To begin with, we belong to a
democratic country and everyone has a right to work where one pleases. Such enforcement may result in
working passively and there will be no motivation. So the rural residents may not get appropriate
treatment and service. Secondly, fewer and fewer students would choose such majors and careers, and so
in the long run there would be shortage of such professionals.
ln my opinion, it would be better to have such a rule. lt would be a win-win situation for both, rural people
and the professionals. lt would also help to bridge the gap between the cities and the countryside. The
government can, however, make fresh teachers and doctors want to work in the rural areas by offering
higher salaries and other incentives.
To sum up, it could be said that sending doctors and teachers to rural areas would be an ideal situation, but
the government should offer some financial and non-financial schemes to the fresh doctors and teachers
so that they willingly go to such areas and work with full zeal and energy. 
As a 
big
 gap is there between the urban and 
rural
 areas
, 
some
 people
 opine that 
teachers
 and 
doctors
, who
are 
fresh
 out of college, should 
work
 in villages for a few years. 
However
, others believe that the choice of
where to 
work
 should be 
left
 on the 
teachers
 and 
doctors
. 
ln
 this essay, I shall discuss the merits and
demerits of both approaches and 
finally
 give my 
opinton
.
There are 
many
 advantages of having 
teachers
 and 
doctors
 work
 in 
rural
 areas
. 
Firstly
, the 
people
 in the
villages will have access to medical care and education, which they 
are deprived
 of 
normally
. 
Secondly
, it
would be 
good
 for the 
teachers
 and 
doctors
, who are 
fresh
 from university to translate their theoretical
knowledge into practice. 
ln
 urban 
areas
 there are already 
so
 many
 experienced 
teachers
 and doctors.
Therefore
, 
people
 would 
naturally
 not opt for the 
fresh
 graduates. 
ln
 a 
rural
 setting, they would gain a lot
of confidence 
very
 early on in their career. 
Finally
, a few of these 
doctors
 and 
teachers
 may choose to 
live
permanently
 in those villages to serve humanity.
On the other hand
, this compulsory policy may have 
some
 negative
 effects. To 
begin
 with, we belong to a
democratic country and everyone has a right to 
work
 where one 
pleases
. Such enforcement may result in
working 
passively
 and there will be no motivation. 
So
 the 
rural
 residents may not 
get
 appropriate
treatment and service. 
Secondly
, fewer and fewer students would choose such majors and careers, and 
so
in the long run there would be shortage of such professionals.
ln
 my opinion, it would be better to have such a 
rule
. 
lt
 would be a win-win situation for both, 
rural
 people
and the professionals. 
lt
 would 
also
 help
 to bridge the gap between the cities and the countryside. The
government
 can, 
however
, 
make
 fresh
 teachers
 and 
doctors
 want to 
work
 in the 
rural
 areas
 by offering
higher salaries and other incentives.
To sum up, it could 
be said
 that sending 
doctors
 and 
teachers
 to 
rural
 areas
 would be an ideal situation, 
but
the 
government
 should offer 
some
 financial and non-financial schemes to the 
fresh
 doctors
 and teachers
so
 that they 
willingly
 go to such 
areas
 and 
work
 with full zeal and energy. 
Do not write below this line