Differences befween counfries ore borely eyident lhese doys. Everyone in lhe world is wecrfing lhe some bronds ond wdlching ihe sorne ry chonnels ond movies. Do you think it is o posifive or o negolive developmenl?
Differences befween counfries ore borely eyident lhese doys. Everyone in lhe world is wecrfing lhe some bronds ond wdlching ihe sorne ry chonnels ond movies. Do you think it is o posifive or o negolive developmenl? pX0
It is irrefutable that because of globalization, similarities between countries are more obvious these days
than in the past. ln many ways people around the world are becoming more and more similar. This
situation is both - a positive as well as a negative development. I personally believe that the advantages
are much more.
The main advantage of this change is that communication is much better nowadays; people understand
other cultures much better and have become more open in their outlook of life. This has resulted in more
business and cultural contacts among different nations. Multinational companies have opened in many
parts of the world providing jobs to thousands of people. There is also more efficient trade between
different countries around the globe thereby improving the economies of developing countries. People
have more opportunities to travel and therefore have awareness of other cultures.
The major reason why people consider such a situation negative, is that national identities are being lost.
We eat the same food, watch the same TV programmes, listen to the same music and wear the same
clothes. For instance, the international outlets like Reebok, Nike and Levi's can be seen everywhere. Food
outlets like MacDonald and Starbuck's etc. can be seen in almost all corners of the world. People wearing
the same type of clothes can be seen everywhere. People have also started speaking one language, English,
in many parts of the world. ln fact, English has become the lingua franca today.
However, lfeel that this is a very narrow definition of national identities and nations are as different as
they were ever in the past. Cultural identity is based on far more than just the films we watch or the
clothes we wear. For example, take my own culture of lndia and compare it to the west. We may wear any
clothes, but we never take the names of elders and call them with respect. ln the west, it is quite OK to call
anyone by name. ln fact, they appreciate it more. I believe that after knowing about other cultures, we
learn to respect our culture even more. So, some very deep-rooted national identities will always be there.
To conclude, similarities among people and their lifestyles cannot be denied, However, the similarities we
see today are only on the surface. Total loss of national identities can never take place. Therefore, this
situation is largely positive. 
It is irrefutable that 
because
 of globalization, similarities between countries are more obvious these days
than in the past. 
ln
 many
 ways 
people
 around the 
world
 are becoming more and more similar. This
situation is both 
-
 a 
positive
 as well as
 a 
negative
 development. I 
personally
 believe that the advantages
are much more.
The main advantage of this 
change
 is that communication is much better nowadays; 
people
 understand
other 
cultures
 much better and have become more open in their outlook of life. This has resulted in more
business and cultural contacts among 
different
 nations. Multinational 
companies
 have opened in 
many
parts of the 
world
 providing jobs to thousands of 
people
. There is 
also
 more efficient trade between
different
 countries around the globe thereby improving the economies of 
developing countries
. 
People
have more opportunities to travel and 
therefore
 have awareness of other cultures.
The major reason why 
people
 consider such a situation 
negative
, is that 
national
 identities
 are 
being lost
.
We eat the same food, 
watch
 the same TV 
programmes
, listen to the same music and wear the same
clothes. 
For instance
, the international outlets like Reebok, Nike and Levi's can be 
seen
 everywhere. Food
outlets like MacDonald and 
Starbuck
's etc. can be 
seen
 in almost all corners of the 
world
. 
People
 wearing
the same type of clothes can be 
seen
 everywhere. 
People
 have 
also
 started
 speaking one language, English,
in 
many
 parts of the 
world
. 
ln
 fact, English has become the lingua franca 
today
.
However
, 
lfeel
 that this is a 
very
 narrow definition of 
national
 identities
 and nations are as 
different
 as
they were ever in the past. Cultural 
identity
 is based
 on far more than 
just
 the films we 
watch
 or the
clothes we wear. 
For example
, take my 
own
 culture
 of 
lndia
 and compare it to the west. We may wear any
clothes, 
but
 we never take the names of elders and call them with respect. 
ln
 the west, it is quite OK to call
anyone by name. 
ln
 fact, they appreciate it more. I believe that after knowing about other 
cultures
, we
learn to respect our 
culture
 even more. 
So
, 
some
 very
 deep-rooted 
national
 identities
 will always be there.
To conclude
, similarities among 
people
 and their lifestyles cannot 
be denied
, 
However
, the similarities we
see
 today
 are 
only
 on the surface. Total loss of 
national
 identities
 can never take place. 
Therefore
, this
situation is 
largely
 positive
. 
Do not write below this line