Developing countries require international organization’s help. Some people prefer financial aid, while others think practical aid and advice are better. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.

In recent years, the help which is needed for developing countries has been more crucial since they are at improving stage. It is argued that pecuniary support is more viable for them, while the others believe that they need practical aid and advice. As far as I am concerned, I think that both are equally essential. On the one hand, such countries are struggling for meet their expenses as that they are trying to improve, but the money is in short supply in them. In other words, they have not developed yet, and to promote military, education and healthcare, they need to surmount financial barriers. However, financial aid from international organizations can help them to overcome their challenges. For example, if the government cannot provide schools, universities, army and hospitals with adequate facilities due to the lack of funding, financial aid can be the best option to cope with the issues. Therefore, in some cases, pecuniary support is the best solution to a number of problems. On the other hand, sometimes even inordinate amount of funding is not sufficient. That is to say, the authority in some developing countries cannot manage their budget, and they squander it. That is to say, instead of promoting the education, healthcare and standards of living in their countries, because of the lack of knowledge in economics, money is wasted on vain projects. However, practical help or advice can contribute the most to such states as they can be guidance to the government to spend their budget in efficient ways. Hence, in some cases, practical help and guidance is more viable.