companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. to what extent do you agree?
companies should provide sports and social facilities for local communities. XG99A
There are some plausible counter-arguments, yet I firmly believe that local communities can take advantage of sport and social facilities which are provided by companies if some financial and practical regulations are considered.
Firstly, fundamentally and lawfully, who is responsible for supplying social services in the societies are governments. In other words, sports and social facilities as a part of social services should be made accessible by public sectors. Thus companies could not be forced to provide sports and social facilities; conversely, they should be encouraged. In fact, without willing to supply these services, companies will gradually refuse supporting customers in order to decline relative expenses.
On the other hand, financially speaking, benefits maximization is the essential rule for private companies in the competitive market. Therefore, the financial situation should how to regulate result in making a win-win game for private sectors. For instance, giving tax reductions to companies who provide social facilities undoubtedly helps to make them interested. Furthermore, when companies are allowed to promote themselves alongside public services supplement they will be extremely eager such as through sponsoring sports, advertising on social facilities, and signing billboards in social facilitated areas.
Finally, supplying social services for local communities by the private sector may earlier take place rather than by public sector especially in poor societies. In other words, in some countries in light of the shortage of budget and low priority of their local communities to develop, laying on private companies and persuading them to provide parts of social services may lead to coming up mentioned developments through a fast track. For this reason, in many African countries both national and international companies are invited to collaborate on various projects; however, small projects for local communities.
In conclusion, conveying, not forcing, companies to provide sports and social facilities for local communities have an avalanche of financial and practical merits for both people and government however it requires applying some regulations as a breeding ground for collaborating with private sectors. Thus I wholeheartedly contend that governments should concentrate on persuading companies to provide social facilities to a possible extent.
There are
some
plausible counter-arguments,
yet
I
firmly
believe that
local
communities
can take advantage of
sport
and
social
facilities which
are provided
by
companies
if
some
financial and practical regulations
are considered
.
Firstly
,
fundamentally
and
lawfully
, who is responsible for supplying
social
services
in the societies are
governments
.
In other words
,
sports
and
social
facilities as a part of
social
services
should
be made
accessible by public
sectors
.
Thus
companies
could not
be forced
to
provide
sports
and
social
facilities;
conversely
, they should
be encouraged
. In fact, without willing to supply these
services
,
companies
will
gradually
refuse supporting customers in order to decline relative expenses.
On the other hand
,
financially
speaking, benefits maximization is the essential
rule
for
private
companies
in the competitive market.
Therefore
, the financial situation
should how
to regulate result in making a win-win game for
private
sectors
.
For instance
, giving tax reductions to
companies
who
provide
social
facilities
undoubtedly
helps
to
make
them interested.
Furthermore
, when
companies
are
allowed
to promote themselves alongside public
services
supplement they will be
extremely
eager such as through sponsoring
sports
, advertising on
social
facilities, and signing billboards in
social
facilitated areas.
Finally
, supplying
social
services
for
local
communities
by the
private
sector
may earlier take place
rather
than by public
sector
especially
in poor societies.
In other words
, in
some
countries in light of the shortage of budget and low priority of their
local
communities
to develop, laying on
private
companies
and persuading them to
provide
parts of
social
services
may lead to coming up mentioned developments through a
fast
track
.
For this reason
, in
many
African countries both national and international
companies
are invited
to collaborate on various projects;
however
,
small
projects for
local
communities.
In conclusion
, conveying, not forcing,
companies
to
provide
sports
and
social
facilities for
local
communities
have an avalanche of financial and practical merits for both
people
and
government
however
it requires applying
some
regulations as a breeding ground for collaborating with
private
sectors
.
Thus
I
wholeheartedly
contend that
governments
should concentrate on persuading
companies
to
provide
social
facilities to a possible extent.
Do not write below this line