All around the globe every year many animal species become extinct. However, some people feel that governments should be concerned more with solving the problems of human life. Discuss both views and give your opinion.

Human activities have posed a greater threat for the persistence of some rare animal species. It is said that people’s administration across the globe should work for the sake of human life. However, in my opinion, while it is required to give the priority to mankind due to being the prominent specie on the earth, I mainly disagree with this because all parts of the nature should be protected to preserve the world Despite the fact that the people should be treated first while designing the policies, the existence of flora and fauna also deserving in maintaining the environmental equilibrium. As some important animal species are in danger of extinction, this could be affected in natural balance. Specifically, some African leopards have become endangered leading to an increment in the population of some herbivorous animals, which could throw the dependable system out of balance. If the leopards are not become extinct the forests would have been conserved by controlling the consumption of plants. This implies that the people should pay their concentration to save the components of nature for their own benefit. There is no doubt that the policies of a country should be designed prioritizing the persistence of the most prestigious creature on the earth. Even though some essential activities, such as shipping poses a threat for the survival of whales in the ocean, maritime exercises could not be avoided. Instead, the impact could have been minimized by mitigating the impact of sea pollutants. In fact, the global operations required to provide essential services are being prominent. In conclusion, although man should solve their own problems with a higher importance, the rare kinds of creatures should be protected in order to safeguard the entire livings.