accoridng to fross they say me on you

The passage and the lecture are both about cutting trees. The passage points out the positive effects of destroying forests on people, while the lecturer denies that idea and points out crucial effects on the earth and the environment, effectively challenging with 3 main ideas made in the lecture. I will stand out these ideas in the subsequent paragraphs. To begin with, the passage stresses that technology has developed and still developing which makes helps people cut trees easily. According to the passage, cutting trees gives us huge areas to make new farmlands to produce food due to the fact that civilization is increasing day by day. Having said that the lecturer claims that 60% of trees located in Brazil have been cut and which will affect the environment in long-term consequences, and it merely helps people make money in the short term. In addition, the lecturer points out that farming tech also developing in the process which helps farmers to grow plants without soil. Furthermore, the passage demonstrates the requires for new residential areas due to population and also helps people to sell new areas to make money which helps the local area's economy grow. However, the lecturer claims that destroying rainforests is harmful to both animals and ecosystems. According to the lecturer, 28% of Oxygen is produced from rainforests, and killing animals also insects has an important role on the environment. That’s why people should not be irresponsible with that action. Lastly, the passage illustrates destroying forests has benefits for local businesses which will help people to find jobs since they will need to hire people to work. However, the lecturer refutes the idea made in the passage by claiming people who live near forests just take little money for their effort due to they are from developing countries such as Brazil. Also, in these countries, a small group of organizations earns money from cutting trees. It has not beneficial for local people, living near forests.