Some people believe that government should spend as much money as possible in exploring outerspace, while others opine that money should be spend public services. Discuss both view and give your opinion.
Some people believe that government should spend as much money as possible in exploring outerspace, while others opine that money should be spend public services. 2xb
In today's competitive age where, countries around the globe are investing astronomically in exploring outerspace, However in sharp contrast there are millions who are deprived of fundamental needs. Hence, one school of thought advocates spending on public services, while others endorse exploring outerspace. This essay discusses both the sides of the argument, are a logical conclusion is evolved.
Analysis of former group reveals that budgeting outerspace is crucial for the development of space science, in recent past, possibility of experimental life is successfully explored with the development
Of space science. Moreover, the development of telecommunication and meteorological department is possible due to space science. To give an example, 104 satellites were launched by a single rocket on 15 February 2017 by I. S. R. O. is the quantum leap in the field of space science.
However, although exploring outerspace could be a boost to space science, there are millions who are starving, in such a scenario prioritising space science lame. For example, the countries like Latin America, African countries, Zimbabwe etc are the epitome of such cases.
Another argument that supports public services is that healthcar facilities need considerable budget of the government in order to curtail mortality and mobility rates. To quote an example, every seven minutes one person dies in the world because of Tuberculosis, which is a curable disease, which is a parragone of such case. Lastly, transportation, infrastructure, defence, electricity and fresh water are the public services that improves the quality of life of the citizens, owing to such reasons public services should be expended enormously.
On the close scrutiny, I conclude that funding space exploration on the pretext of development is not acceptable where basic needs are not fulfilled.
In
today
's competitive age where, countries around the globe are investing
astronomically
in exploring
outerspace
,
However
in sharp contrast there are millions who
are deprived
of fundamental needs.
Hence
, one school of
thought
advocates spending on
public
services
, while others endorse exploring
outerspace
. This essay discusses both the sides of the argument, are a logical conclusion
is evolved
.
Analysis of former group reveals that budgeting
outerspace
is crucial for the development of
space
science
, in recent past, possibility of experimental life is
successfully
explored with the development
Of
space
science
.
Moreover
, the development of telecommunication and meteorological department is possible due to
space
science
. To give an example, 104 satellites
were launched
by a single rocket on 15 February 2017 by I. S. R. O. is the quantum leap in the field of
space
science.
However
, although exploring
outerspace
could be a boost to
space
science
, there are millions who are starving, in such a scenario
prioritising
space
science
lame.
For example
, the countries like Latin America, African countries, Zimbabwe etc are the epitome of such cases.
Another argument that supports
public
services
is that
healthcar
facilities need considerable budget of the
government
in order to curtail mortality and mobility rates. To quote an example, every seven minutes one person
dies
in the world
because
of Tuberculosis, which is a curable disease, which is a
parragone
of such case.
Lastly
, transportation, infrastructure,
defence
, electricity and fresh water are the
public
services
that
improves
the quality of life of the citizens, owing to such reasons
public
services
should
be expended
enormously
.
On the
close scrutiny
, I conclude that funding
space
exploration on the pretext of development is not acceptable where basic needs are not fulfilled.
Do not write below this line