Some consider that parents ought to urge their mature children to move away from their home as early as possible. Their opponents, however, argue that youngsters should be allowed to live with their family on condition that they wish. Although there exist strong arguments on both of these sides, I personally feel that the former view is far more sensible
Some consider that parents ought to urge their mature children to move away from their home as early as possible. Their opponents, however, argue that youngsters should be allowed to live with their family on condition that they wish. Although there exist strong arguments on both of these sides, I personally feel that the former view is far more sensible lLQ
Some consider that parents ought to urge their mature children to move away from their home as early as possible. Their opponents, however, argue that youngsters should be allowed to live with their family on condition that they wish. Although there exist strong arguments on both of these sides, I personally feel that the former view is far more sensible.
From one angle, allowing young people to stay together with their parents can protect them some challenges. As most teenagers are incapable of adopting new difficulties, they may encounter financial and emotional problems. Due to lack of life experience, they may not able to find ways to make a living which results in depression consequently. On top of this, some of them may turn into bad companies by committing crimes to owing to non-existant of parental control. However, along with their family, such unfortunate scenarios would definitely be avoided.
From another angle, I believe that young people who are obliged to live independently stand at a better chance to be a successful adult. Admittedly, problems, such as accomodation bills, income and others alike, faced on a daily basis is a normal part of adult life. Exposing youngsters to such difficulties can certainly serve beneficially to them because they will develop a number of survival qualities including persistance, will-power and responsibility. For example, young adults are made to leave their house at their 18 so as to become independent in majority of Western cultures. As a result, they possess far higher levels of confidence and independance compared to their peers in Asia where such a practise are very rare.
To conclude, the idea of giving a chance for a child to live at home for long prolonged periods might make sense to some extent. Nevertheless, I believe doing the opposite and making them to live independently is more effective way of nurturing them. 
Some
 consider that parents ought to urge their mature children to 
move
 away from their home as early as possible. Their opponents, 
however
, argue that youngsters should be 
allowed
 to 
live
 with their family on condition that they wish. Although there exist strong arguments on both of these sides, I 
personally
 feel that the former view is far more sensible.
From one angle, allowing young 
people
 to stay together with their parents can protect them 
some
 challenges. As most 
teenagers
 are incapable of adopting new difficulties, they may encounter financial and emotional problems. Due to lack of life experience, they may not able to find ways to 
make
 a living which results in depression 
consequently
. On top of this, 
some
 of them may turn into 
bad
 companies
 by committing crimes to owing to 
non-existant
 of parental control. 
However
, along with their family, such unfortunate scenarios would definitely 
be avoided
.
From another angle, I believe that young 
people
 who 
are obliged
 to 
live
 independently
 stand at a better chance to be a successful adult. 
Admittedly
, problems, such as 
accomodation
 bills, income 
and others
 alike, faced on a daily basis is a normal part of adult life. Exposing youngsters to such difficulties can 
certainly
 serve 
beneficially
 to them 
because
 they will develop a number of survival qualities including 
persistance
, will-power and responsibility. 
For example
, young adults 
are made
 to 
leave
 their 
house
 at their 18 
so as to
 become independent in 
majority of
 Western cultures. 
As a result
, they possess far higher levels of confidence and 
independance
 compared to their peers in Asia where such a 
practise
 are 
very
 rare.
To conclude
, the 
idea
 of giving a chance for a child to 
live
 at home for long prolonged periods might 
make
 sense to 
some
 extent. 
Nevertheless
, I believe doing the opposite and making them to 
live
 independently
 is more effective way of nurturing them. 
Do not write below this line