SOCIAL ECONOMY STATE POLITICAL GUARANTEE
SOCIAL ECONOMY STATE POLITICAL GUARANTEE Bd1Nj
This has not worked well for the country and has even led to the waning popularity of the leader (Taylor, 15). The lack of consensus on important matters such as how to handle a recession put into question the ability of the government or its stakeholders to solve some of society’s problems through economic intervention.
Some people argue that efficient management of the economy is critical to existence of a good society. However, this kind of management can be done on a micro level and on a macro level. The macro level leans towards government intervention while the micro level leans towards free market economics. Since resources are scarce, a good knowledge of how the economy works allows for optimization of these resources and hence enjoyment of efficiency.
Good societies should therefore be those ones that use fewer resources or waste even less; issues that can best be implemented on a micro level. Furthermore, citizens that manage their economies well will allocate their budgets more efficiently especially as a result of the opportunity cost principle and this will lead to better growth (Financial web, 22).
This principle refers to the benefits that have to be foregone by a decision maker when shifting from one opportunity to another one that may be better. To understand the argument, consider a person who had a certain amount of money in the bank, choosing to take this money from the bank into the stock exchange would mean that the person will forego interests in the said bank but will be looking forward to the benefits of owning stock.
The opportunity cost would therefore be represented by that decision to change investments. A good society is often run in the same manner. Policy makers cannot always keep recognizing the opportunities that are likely to benefit their citizens so personal initiative by the said members should be advocated. It should be noted that although consumption leads to economic growth, this can only occur when the right choices are made on what to buy and what to save by market players.
A well functioning society should be one that produces results for its inputs. In other words, if a society injects certain amounts of cash into the economy then the expected outcomes should be profitable.
Once no change is recorded or a negative one arises then such societies will start degrading. Issues such as unemployment and higher poverty rates are common in societies that reported no economic gains. One can therefore say that prosperity is highly determined by a stakeholder’s ability to plan for these gains. Failure to do so may create a breeding ground for a number of social evils. 
This has not worked well for the country and has even led to the waning popularity of the leader (Taylor, 15). The lack of consensus on 
important
 matters such as how to handle a recession put into question the ability of the 
government
 or its stakeholders to solve 
some
 of 
society’s
 problems through 
economic
 intervention.
Some
 people
 argue that efficient management of the 
economy
 is critical to existence of a 
good
 society
. 
However
, this kind of management can 
be done
 on a micro 
level
 and on a macro 
level
. The macro 
level
 leans towards 
government
 intervention while the micro 
level
 leans towards free market 
economics
. Since resources are scarce, a 
good
 knowledge of how the 
economy
 works 
allows
 for optimization of these resources and 
hence
 enjoyment of efficiency.
Good
 societies
 should 
therefore
 be 
those ones
 that 
use
 fewer resources or waste even less; issues that can best 
be implemented
 on a micro 
level
. 
Furthermore
, citizens that manage their 
economies
 well will allocate their budgets more 
efficiently
 especially
 as a result
 of the 
opportunity
 cost principle and this will lead to better growth (Financial web, 22).
This principle refers to the benefits that 
have to
 be foregone
 by a decision maker when shifting from one 
opportunity
 to another one that may be better. To understand the argument, consider a person who had a certain amount of money in the bank, choosing to take this money from the bank into the stock exchange would mean that the person will forego interests in the said bank 
but
 will be looking forward to the benefits of owning stock.
The 
opportunity
 cost would 
therefore
 be represented
 by that decision to 
change
 investments. A 
good
 society
 is 
often
 run in the same manner. 
Policy makers
 cannot always 
keep
 recognizing the 
opportunities
 that are likely to benefit their citizens 
so
 personal initiative by the said members should 
be advocated
. It should 
be noted
 that although consumption leads to 
economic
 growth, this can 
only
 occur when the right choices 
are made
 on what to 
buy
 and what to save by market players.
A well functioning 
society
 should be one that produces results for its inputs. 
In other words
, if a 
society
 injects certain amounts of cash into the 
economy
 then the 
expected
 outcomes should be profitable.
Once no 
change
 is recorded
 or a 
negative
 one arises then such 
societies
 will 
start
 degrading. Issues such as unemployment and higher poverty rates are common in 
societies
 that reported no 
economic
 gains. One can 
therefore
 say that prosperity is 
highly
 determined by a stakeholder’s ability to plan for these gains. Failure to do 
so
 may create a breeding ground for a number of social evils. 
Do not write below this line