Check your IELTS writing task 1 and essay, this is a free correction and evaluation service.
Check IELTS Writing it's free
British CouncilIDPCambridge
IELTS Writing Answer Sheet
Barcode 3
Candidate Name:
Lê Như Quỳnh
Center Number:
1
2
3
4
   
Candidate Number:
6
6
2
1
Module (shade one box):
Academic:
 
General Training:
Test Date:
0
D
4
D
   
0
M
5
M
   
2
Y
0
Y
2
Y
2
Y

Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance?

Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance? b67oX
It is generally argued that weather the entrance to historical buildings such as museums and art galleries must be free for local people or should impose a minimal or voluntary charge in the entry ticket. In my opinion, while I believe that the cost-free service could promote national pride; however, it is required to collect money from the general public for the maintenance of these monuments. To begin with, specific entrance fees by people could help to preserve these buildings for the future. In other words, these ancient buildings require regular care and maintenance, which could only be possible with the renovation, that can be done with public money. If a museum contains updated services as well as things related to the past, it would lure people to visit again, and save them for years. A national museum of sports in India, for instance, has a limited ticket cost for entry. This money is used by its management, to update the facilities for the visitors, or to protect its beauty and history for the upcoming generations. Moreover, government subsidence could not afford the salaries to workers of art galleries. As most of the historical buildings are partially aided by the administration, the funds could not help to raise salaries to its caregivers. If a compulsory entrance is imposed to the public along with some voluntary funds, everything runs smoothly as all the staff get their monthly earnings without hassle. Take the case of art galleries in Finland; they have employed a lot of employees to address the visitors with directions or as language translators. Their income is partly dependent on public money or government subsidies as the council funds are limited. In conclusion, although the exemption of money from people to the historical monuments increases cultural and country’s dignity, yet I believe that particular entry fees from local people should be levied to admittance, just to sustain the heritage of museums and galleries.
It is
generally
argued that weather the entrance to historical
buildings
such as
museums
and art
galleries
must
be free for local
people
or should impose a minimal or voluntary charge in the entry ticket. In my opinion, while I believe that the cost-free service could promote national pride;
however
, it
is required
to collect
money
from the general
public
for the maintenance of these monuments. To
begin
with, specific entrance fees by
people
could
help
to preserve these
buildings
for the future.
In other words
, these ancient
buildings
require regular care and maintenance, which could
only
be possible with the renovation, that can
be done
with
public
money
. If a
museum
contains updated services
as well
as things related to the past, it would lure
people
to visit again, and save them for years. A national
museum
of sports in India,
for instance
, has a limited ticket cost for entry. This
money
is
used
by its management, to update the facilities for the visitors, or to protect its beauty and history for the upcoming generations.
Moreover
,
government
subsidence could not afford the salaries to workers of art
galleries
. As most of the historical
buildings
are
partially
aided by the administration, the funds could not
help
to raise salaries to its caregivers. If a compulsory entrance
is imposed
to the
public
along with
some
voluntary funds, everything runs
smoothly
as all the staff
get
their monthly earnings without hassle. Take the case of art
galleries
in Finland; they have employed
a lot of
employees to address the visitors with directions or as language translators. Their income is partly dependent on
public
money
or
government
subsidies as the council funds
are limited
.
In conclusion
, although the exemption of
money
from
people
to the historical monuments increases cultural and country’s dignity,
yet
I believe that particular entry fees from local
people
should
be levied
to admittance,
just
to sustain the heritage of
museums
and
galleries
.
Do not write below this line
Official use only
CC
7.0
LR
5.5
GR
6.5
TA
7.0
OVERALL BAND SCORE
6.5
Barcode 1
Barcode 1

IELTS essay Should museums and art galleries be free of charge for the general public or should a charge, even a voluntary charge, be levied for admittance?

👍 High Quality Evaluation

Correction made by newly developed AI

✅ Check your Writing

Paste/write text, get result

⭐ Writing Ideas

Free for everyone

⚡ Comprehensive report

Analysis of your text

⌛ Instant feedback

Get report in less than a second

Recent posts