Should court shows be broadcasted frequently

There is a discussion about the upcoming scenery of TV court shows if it once is broadcasted. While many agree that publishing courtrooms should be kept running, I would argue that there are some reasons to put off this type of program. On the one hand, broadcasting may invade both defendants and offenders' families. A great number of residents who are quite sensitive to sharing private information about primes as a way that if they witnessed their tragic story once again on live, residents who had boycotted them before have a right to do it tremendously over again. As evidence, an indictment about a criminal got the death penalty for murdering women and under-18 children has been editted to come on television which could leads to unforgettable nightmare and dramatic effects on his elderly parents as they just had lost their son, like depression, mental health which are tough to get over. Showing to everyone about illicit affairs is not always a great deal of benefit to those vulnerable. At the same time, there would be lack of concentration and full of mistakes due to the appearance of cameras. Actors, actresses and participants invited to re-emerge the case and court, however, they just focus on their own appearance in front of the camera but the content and messages related to case and law they are supposed to transform to the audience. Therefore, producers and related channels could be accused and convicted of posting distorted truth and illegalizing civil rights due to actors’ performance. Moreover, because of this drama, they could be on the brink of despair and lose their career path gradually. In a nutshell, although courtrooms is a kind of programme that should be promoted more for a better awareness in the community, it still has some drawbacks about humans’ privacy and professionalism at work that we should take into account before broadcasting.