Pro-environment Practice Study

Pro-environment Practice Study In “ How Gender Stereotypes Affect Pro-Environment Behavior”, the author assumes that conservation behaviors are intrinsically associated with gender stereotypes. Specifically, others may question a person's sexual orientation based on how they contribute to environmental protection. While women are more likely concerned about the environment, males worry that eco-friendly behaviors might brand them as feminine. This new paper perfectly exemplifies those whose daily routines include various environmentally friendly activities and their fear that these activities may cause them to lose their masculinity. To conclude, the author suggests some businessmen should create bags with macho-man logos to make men's and women’s green activities look similar. While the author is attempting to make a good point, the message is occasionally confused owing to inadequate research. To begin with, the author is writing for the Pacific Standard and claims that men are less likely to recycle because others will think they are gay. However, gender is only a minor influence on people's efforts to environmental conservation. It is evident that there are several reasons why individuals are ecologically responsible whether they are unwilling or cannot completely comprehend the long-term effects of green behaviors. People with higher education, for instance, play more active roles in green behaviors than those with lower education levels. Moreover, the author’s view is comparably one-sided when he only mentions the hypothesis of Janet Swim, a psychologist at Pennsylvania State University, and her colleagues to discuss the impression created by different types of green activities in the journal Sex Roles. Similarly, the number of volunteers taking part in research comparably low, 170 in the first study and 303 in the following activity. Second, the statement: “those who engaged in gender-incongruent green actions were ranked as less likely to be heterosexual, " is biased and sparks a strong response among readers since the author puts a label on environmentally-conscious men. Furthermore, there is no valid evidence for the point that environmentalism is a feminine activity. Concern about our surroundings develops when individuals grow up and are educated. According to a study conducted by UN Industrial Development Organisation at Guide on gender mainstreaming environmental management projects “Both women and men participate and benefit from capacity-building activities and training, and they are given the opportunity to meaningfully contribute to decision-making processes and take on leadership roles in sustainable industrial production. ” Finally, more precise data should be provided such as figures about gender-specific and gender-neutral acts, and the author should take a more typical example before jumping to the conclusion, as a cartoon character cannot represent average people’s behaviors or confirm whether green actions are connected with manliness. Although the solution is to offer a mix of traditionally male and feminine projects and then enable volunteers to choose their roles is sensible because it stimulates pro-environmental behaviors and minimizes gender role expectations, the article is missing key statistical information. It does not include participants' backgrounds whether they are college students, retirees, or active volunteers in environmental projects and what percentage of the responders were high income or low income. This article neglects to include the hurdles to pro-environmental activity and the social consequences of males abandoning environmental preservation, therefore it is more necessary to continue researching gender stereotypes around environmentalism and its associated behaviors. While I agree with the article’s thesis that gender influences participation in environmental activities, I disagree with the lack of research methodology included in the article. The article has aroused several questions concerning the lack of proof and responders which were studied. The masses are concerned about how others perceive themselves; thus, once prejudice is formed, an average citizen might force others to comply with their disposition, forming a gender-sensitive society in the long run.